PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7849346

Documenting pharmaceutical care: creating a standard.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the need for a standardized, systematized approach to document patient pharmacotherapy, workable in all pharmacy practice settings, and to propose a model to meet the identified needs. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE search was conducted, in addition to an assessment of current practices and a review of known sources of pharmacotherapy/pharmaceutical care evaluation and documentation methodology. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy lacks a universally accepted, standardized, systematized approach to document the evaluation of a patient's pharmacotherapy. An approach is presented that distills the concepts of pharmaceutical care into a manageable documentation format and provides a customization of the medical history and physical examination/subjective-objective-assessment-plan system to meet the unique needs of pharmacy. This approach provides a convenient format for notes for all pharmacists, applicable in any practice setting. It provides a starting point for decisions on what pharmacy wants and accepts as a standard to provide continuity of pharmaceutical care to patients, uniform communication with healthcare colleagues, appropriate instruction to students, data analysis to demonstrate the value of services, and needed guidance to software vendors, medical records departments, and third-party payers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B R Canaday, P C Yarborough. 1994. Documenting pharmaceutical care: creating a standard.. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809402801114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗