PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7858276

The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study.

D Kidd·G Stewart·J Baldry·J Johnson·D Rossiter·A Petruckevitch·A J Thompson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The majority of measurement scales used to evaluate outcome in rehabilitation are ordinal in nature and consequently statistically valid assessments of change are difficult to make. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) can be weighted to possess interval properties, potentially allowing more accurate analysis of change. In this study the FIM was compared to the Barthel Index (BI) to determine its validity, reliability and ease of use in two groups of 25 patients undergoing neurorehabilitation. The FIM was considered to be more valid than the BI, and equally reliable in the assessment of disability. When the two disability scores were compared using subjective and objective assessment the agreement between them was comparable, although neither was high.

Explore related subjects

Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationPersons with DisabilitiesHumansObserver VariationPsychomotor PerformanceRehabilitationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Kidd, G Stewart, J Baldry, J Johnson, D Rossiter, A Petruckevitch, A J Thompson. 1995. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study.. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289509166622

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance.

Proxy ratings of functional status were compared with subject self-reports in five domains relevant to the study of older persons and with observations of subject performance in two areas (physical and instrumental functioning). Data were derived from 233 proxy-subject pairs evaluated in a prospective study of hip fracture patients aged 65 years or more in Baltimore, Maryland (1990-1991). Agreement between proxy and subject reports was highest for a summary measure of instrumental functioning and lowest for a measure of depression. Proxies tended to report more disability than did subjects, although bias varied by function. Patterns of agreement for proxy reports versus observations of performance compared with patterns for proxy reports versus subject reports were lower for measures of instrumental functioning, and bias was generally more extreme for instrumental and physical functioning measures. The authors conclude that agreement and bias differ by functional domain, by the way summary measures are created and scored, and by the criterion against which proxy reports are compared.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Characteristics of patients admitted to hospital with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

AIMS: To examine the characteristics of patients admitted to Auckland Hospital with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to assess their management prior to hospitalisation. METHODS: Prospective survey of 99 patients admitted with COPD over an 8 week period. Of these, 80 patients were interviewed about their social circumstances, physical functioning, smoking habits and medical treatment. They also had their inhaler technique checked and FEV1 measured. RESULTS: Subjects had a mean age of 70.6 years with a mean FEV1 of 29% of predicted. 45% lived alone and a third still smoked. The mean value for their usual physical functioning was 15.4 (possible 10-30) on the SF-36 health status questionnaire. 84% of all subjects used a beta-agonist, 50% an anticholinergic bronchodilator, 69% inhaled steroids, 18% oral steroids, and 19% theophylline. 40% used nebulised medication and only 6% had domiciliary oxygen. 40% reported having an influenza vaccination in the preceding year and 27% had participated in some form of pulmonary rehabilitation. The mean length of stay was 7.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for COPD report marked impairment in physical functioning, despite which many live alone. They frequently use inhaled and oral steroids, and nebulised medication, but only a minority had received an influenza vaccination or attended pulmonary rehabilitation.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care.

STUDY DESIGN: In this article, the authors review the three broad categories of measures that have been used to objectify functional improvement after nonoperative care of painful spinal disorder patients-physical, psychological, and socioeconomic. For each of the three categories, the major measures used are discussed, as well as research relating to the efficacy of the measures. OBJECTIVE: To point out the many differences that still exist among research studies regarding which functional outcome measures to use and when to use them. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During the past few decades, it has been made abundantly clear that painful spinal disorders, particularly when associated with work disability and/or financial benefits, result from a complex interaction of medical, psychological, and social factors. This has resulted in frequent confusion regarding what constitutes the primary roots of the disabling process. Currently, a more comprehensive biopsychosocial perspective of chronic pain and disability has emerged that has significant implications for diagnostic and treatment philosophies of practitioners. METHODS: Identifying the measures frequently used to address the important biopsychosocial factors, and evaluating their relative benefits and drawbacks. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is demonstrated that there has been an overall trend in recent years toward using more objective, quantifiable instruments, encompassing the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic parameters of outcomes research in painful spinal disorders. These changes will certainly improve the ability of researchers to tease out which factors tap more directly into such tissue as physical impairment, as well as create greater uniformity of measures that will permit direct comparisons between studies.

Activities of Daily Living↗