PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7860862

Beyond measurement: fourth-generation evaluation in nursing.

T Koch
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Whoever believes that the 'scientific' method should not be the sole approach to quality assurance and evaluation research may be attracted to fourth-generation evaluation. The first three generations of evaluation have been categorized as 'measurement-orientated', 'objective-orientated' and 'judgement-orientated', whereas fourth-generation evaluation is 'negotiation-orientated'. In the present paper the author embarks on a description of these generations and makes suggestions for the implementation of fourth-generation evaluation in the health care setting. The appeal of fourth-generation evaluation is that it argues for all 'stakeholders' to have a right to place their claims, concerns and issues on the negotiating table. The evaluator acts as a facilitator of the evaluation process. 'Stakeholders' refers to all people in the setting who are affected by the evaluation, including managers, evaluators, medical and nursing staff. Participation of patients/clients is central in the negotiation process.

Explore related subjects

Ethics, NursingHumansNegotiatingNursing Evaluation ResearchNursing ProcessPatient ParticipationQuality Assurance, Health CareJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Koch. 1994. Beyond measurement: fourth-generation evaluation in nursing.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20061148.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Developing a mid-range theory of patient advocacy through concept analysis.

AIM: The aim of this paper is to clarify and refine the concept of patient advocacy through synthesizing the advocacy literature in nursing and to establish a theoretical basis for future studies on patient advocacy in nursing. BACKGROUND: Patient advocacy is an essential component of the Registered Nurse professional role. During the past 30 years, the patient advocacy role has become more important, but the concept of patient advocacy lacks a consistent definition and research into nurses' patient advocacy roles is limited. There have been few quantitative empirical studies on patient advocacy in nursing. METHOD: Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was used as a guideline in examining the concept of patient advocacy through synthesizing the advocacy literature in English (1974-2006). FINDINGS: A mid-range theory of patient advocacy emerges during the process of synthesizing and analysing the advocacy literature. Three core attributes of the concept of patient advocacy are identified: (1) safeguarding patients' autonomy; (2) acting on behalf of patients; and (3) championing social justice in the provision of health care. They reflect nurses' patient advocacy roles at both macro- and micro-social levels. Antecedents of patient advocacy occur at both macro- and micro-social levels and call for nurses' advocacy roles in the healthcare system. Consequences produced by nurses' patient advocacy behaviours are contextual. Nurses' patient advocacy behaviours not only can positively influence the patients, other nurses and the nursing profession, but also can cause negative consequences for nurses who take action to advocate for patients. CONCLUSION: The proposed mid-range theory may be useful in guiding advocacy practice in nursing and in guiding research in the advocacy area. The proposed theory needs to be furthered refined and tested in the future.

Ethics, Nursing↗