PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7865078

Food components and caries.

Abstract

For many decades, sugars have been the dietary constituents receiving the most attention in relation to their effects on dental caries. Frequently, however, there is little relationship between the amount of sugar in a food and its ability to induce caries. Therefore, it is clear that constituents in the diet can influence the ability of plaque to lower the pH of sugar solutions. For instance, replacing sugar in foods with xylitol, sorbitol, saccharin, or aspartame may lead to a reduction in the incidence of dental caries. All these sugar substitutes are non-cariogenic, and some may possess cariostatic properties. The presence of arginine-rich proteins in the diet may provide a ready source of this amino acid, which is the substrate for the arginine deiminase pathway which can result in a rapid elevation of plaque pH values. Proline can act as an acceptor for protons from lactate in the Stickland reaction. This is a major but much-neglected metabolic pathway in dental plaque. The presence of fat in experimental diets has been shown to affect their cariogenicity. The effects have been ascribed to enhanced clearance of sugars from the mouth. It is also conceivable that several fatty acids express a potent antibacterial effect. The presence of calcium and phosphorus has been shown to influence the cariogenicity of foods; the effect, however, is restricted to the food containing the minerals. Evidence suggests that pyridoxine (vitamin B6) may exert a cariostatic effect by enhancing decarboxylation activity in dental plaque. It is clear that sugar alone is not the sole determinant of whether food is cariogenic. Furthermore, myriad substances may hinder or enhance the caries-promoting properties of sugars in the diet.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W H Bowen. 1994. Food components and caries.. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374940080021301

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Dentin demineralization in situ during frequent exposures to bananas or sucrose].

The aim of the study was to compare sucrose solution and bananas on demineralizing potential in situ, and to address the question if fluoride toothpaste is equally effective in preventing dentin demineralization at open, smooth surfaces and at plaque stagnation sites (grooves). Four volunteers wore an appliance containing bovine dentin specimens with narrow grooves and a smooth surface for two 1-week in situ periods, with 8 1-minute exposures daily: either by a rinse with 10% sucrose, or by consumption of a piece of banana. Twice daily, the appliance was dipped in toothpaste slurry of a fluoride-free toothpaste at one side and a fluoride toothpaste at the contralateral side. Demineralization was assessed by tranversal microradiography. No difference in dentin demineralization was found after frequent exposure to either sucrose solution or bananas. Fluoride toothpaste effectively protected dentin only at the smooth surfaces. In the grooves, fluoride affected the demineralization pattern; it drove lesions towards the bottom of the groove.

Cariogenic Agents↗

Causes and prevention of dental caries: a perspective on cases and incidence.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present paper is: 1) to review recent concepts of the causes of caries; 2) to illustrate parameters of causes of cases and of incidence; and 3) to outline the consequences for caries prevention and oral health promotion. The paper is divided in three sections. Section 1 reviews recent theories of the causes of caries and summarizes that it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the causes of a case of caries and causes of occurrence of caries in populations. Cases relate to the reasons why individuals get sick, while incidence relates to why so many (or so few) within a population get sick. In section 2 the difference between the causes of a case and of the occurrence in a population is illustrated. A new social epidemiology moves beyond the focus on individual level risk factors to a multi-level perspective. Applied to oral diseases the paradigm of social epidemiology bridges our understanding of the biological determinants of caries with an understanding of the societal determinants of caries. Social epidemiology is the branch of epidemiology that studies the social distribution and social determinants of states of health. Individuals are embedded in societies and populations. In section 3 the insight acquired above is applied to the choice of disease-preventive and oral health-promotive strategies. Prevention of caries and promotion of oral health must be rooted in the understanding of caries as it occurs in populations.

Cariogenic Agents↗

Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste: background to European Union-funded multicentre project.

As in most other established market economies throughout the world the prevalence of dental caries has declined in most Member States of the European Union (EU). There is evidence that the increased use of fluoride toothpaste has been a major factor in this improvement. Recently there has been increasing debate on the alleged link between increased use of fluoride toothpaste, particularly by infants and young children, and increased levels of enamel fluorosis. Central to these discussions are two issues, namely measurement of the amount of fluoride ingested by infants and young children and measurement of enamel opacities including fluorosis. The aims of the project described in this special issue addressed these two measurement issues. Seven EU Partners participated. Standardized methods for recording the amount of fluoride ingested when using fluoride toothpaste were developed and used in the seven sites. Similarly a standardized photographic method for recording enamel opacities, including fluorosis, was developed.

Cariogenic Agents↗