PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7876783

Computer-prompted diagnostic codes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a computer system that would translate patient diagnoses noted by a physician into appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes and maintain a patient-specific up-to-date problem list. METHODS: The intervention consisted of a computerized list (dictionary) of diagnoses, including practice-specific synonyms and abbreviations, linked to their corresponding ICD-9-CM codes. To record the diagnoses for the office visit before the intervention, physicians used International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC-2) codes. After the intervention, physicians used their own words or checked previously identified diagnoses on the computer-generated problem list. The computer then identified the correct ICD-9-CM code. Accuracy of coding was compared before and after the new computerized system was implemented. RESULTS: Visits in which all diagnoses matched increased from 58% to 76% (P < .001) with use of the computer system. Visits in which no computer diagnoses matched the chart decreased from 22% to 8% (P < .001). Errors of omission declined from 38% to 18% (P < .001). Errors of commission decreased from 19% to 11% (P = .006). Overall accuracy increased from 62% to 82% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient medical diagnosis coding can be simplified and accuracy improved by using a computerized dictionary of practice-specific diagnoses and synonyms linked to appropriate ICD-9-CM codes. Such a system provides a computer-generated problem list that accurately reflects the chart and assists with prompted coding on subsequent visits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K S Yarnall, J L Michener, W E Broadhead, W E Hammond, C K Tse. 1995. Computer-prompted diagnostic codes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7876783/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessment of surveillance for meningococcal disease in New York State, 1991.

Prevention of meningococcal disease relies in part on the prompt treatment of household and other close contacts of cases. New York State requires that all meningococcal disease cases be reported within 24 hours of diagnosis to ensure that chemoprophylaxis is given to all exposed persons. The authors used a capture-recapture method to assess completeness of reporting of meningococcal disease in 1991 by comparing persons reported to the Department of Health surveillance system with patients listed in the New York State computerized hospital discharge data set who had a discharge diagnosis of meningococcal disease. Medical records of persons identified from the discharge data set were reviewed to verify the diagnosis of meningococcal disease, and timeliness of reporting was assessed by reviewing surveillance case reports. In 1991, 110 cases of meningococcal disease were reported to the Department of Health and 197 patients were identified from hospital discharge data, of which charts were reviewed for 179 (91%). Of the charts reviewed, 116 (65%) had confirmed or probable meningococcal disease, and 57 (32%) did not have the disease. Completeness of reporting to the notifiable disease surveillance system was estimated to be 93%, and 78% were reported within 2 days of diagnosis. Errors of physicians and medical records departments contributed to the misclassification of medical records. The authors conclude that notifiable disease surveillance for meningococcal disease is relatively complete, but there is a delay in reporting some cases. Frequent errors may make invalidated hospital discharge data unsuitable for communicable disease surveillance.

Abstracting and Indexing