PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7878582

[Consensus conference: methodology and contribution].

Abstract

A consensus conference is a method used to evaluate a medical process and to elaborate practice guidelines. The goal of consensus conference is to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients. The guidelines are written by a multidisplinary jury which analyses scientific datas and clinical practices. Consensus conference don't resolve all medical problems. It's a good evaluation method for the topics where there are non medical sides, inappropriate medical options or different clinical practices in spite of sufficient scientific datas. Consensus conference use three distinct groups: organization committee, jury and experts. The lectures of the experts and the guidelines must distinguish and clarify which is scientifically proved. Use of biomedical databases and critical analysis of biomedical articles are useful. Practice guidelines must be clear, precise, explicit and useful for clinical practices. Measurement of the real usefulness of consensus conference is difficult: it's the problem of the impact of guidelines on care. Usually it could be realized by survey of clinical practices or drugs consuming. The impact will be better with a large use of media, dissemination of the guidelines in the medical faculties and during professional workshops.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Durocher. [Consensus conference: methodology and contribution].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7878582/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗