PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7893708

DNA binding specificity of the Mu Ner protein.

Abstract

Binding of purified phage Mu Ner protein to a series of DNA fragments was investigated in order to determine the length requirements for tight specific binding. Gel retardation experiments with wild-type 307 base pair (bp) Mu DNA and shorter, synthetic oligonucleotides were performed, and apparent dissociation constants (KappD) were determined from the half-saturation point. While Ner formed four complexes with the 307 bp DNA fragment, only one complex was observed with the shorter DNAs. The 50 and 30 bp fragments had KappD values of 5 and 20 nM, respectively. Ner binding was progressively weaker with decreasing size of the DNA fragments, with no binding observed for 12mers. The shortest DNA fragments which bound well were two 18 bp fragments for which KappD values were in the range of 50-100 nM. The stoichiometry of Ner complexes with the 30 and 18 bp fragments was determined using a modified Ferguson method. Ner was found to form a tetramer on the 30 bp DNA and a dimer on the 18 bp DNA, which makes the latter a good candidate for the study of a Ner-DNA complex by NMR. In order to clarify which DNA regions were important for Ner-DNA binding, hydroxyl radical footprinting was performed for a range of Ner concentrations from 30 to 500 nM. The footprint revealed that Ner contacts the DNA backbone every 12-13 bp, on both strands of the DNA. The order in which protected regions appeared with increasing protein concentration indicated that two Ner monomers bound to DNA simultaneously. A model of Ner binding to DNA is proposed on the basis of these results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T E Strzelecka, J J Hayes, G M Clore, A M Gronenborn. 1995-03-07. DNA binding specificity of the Mu Ner protein.. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00009a026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Characteristics of MuA transposase-catalyzed processing of model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates.

Bacteriophage Mu uses non-replicative transposition for integration into the host's chromosome and replicative transposition for phage propagation. Biochemical and structural comparisons together with evolutionary considerations suggest that the Mu transposition machinery might share functional similarities with machineries of the systems that are known to employ a hairpin intermediate during the catalytic steps of transposition. Model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates were used in a minimal-component in vitro system to study their proficiency to promote Mu transpososome assembly and subsequent MuA-catalyzed chemical reactions leading to the strand transfer product. MuA indeed was able to assemble hairpin substrates into a catalytically competent transpososome, open the hairpin ends and accurately join the opened ends to the target DNA. The hairpin opening and transposon end cleavage reactions had identical metal ion preferences, indicating similar conformations within the catalytic center for these reactions. Hairpin length influenced transpososome assembly as well as catalysis: longer loops were more efficient in these respects. In general, MuA's proficiency to utilize different types of hairpin substrates indicates a certain degree of flexibility within the transposition machinery core. Overall, the results suggest that non-replicative and replicative transposition systems may structurally and evolutionarily be more closely linked than anticipated previously.

Bacteriophage mu↗

Dissection of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS): significance of the SGS right arm in Mu biology and DNA gyrase mechanism.

The bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS), required for efficient phage DNA replication, differs from other gyrase sites in the efficiency of gyrase binding coupled with a highly processive supercoiling activity. Genetic studies have implicated the right arm of the SGS as a key structural feature for promoting rapid Mu replication. Here, we show that deletion of the distal portion of the right arm abolishes efficient binding, cleavage, and supercoiling by DNA gyrase in vitro. DNase I footprinting analysis of the intact SGS revealed an adenylyl imidodiphosphate-dependent change in protection in the right arm, indicating that this arm likely forms the T segment that is passed through the cleaved G segment during the supercoiling reaction. Furthermore, in an SGS derivative with an altered right-arm sequence, the left arm showed these changes, suggesting that the selection of a T segment by gyrase is determined primarily by the sequences of the arms. Analysis of the sequences of the SGS and other gyrase sites suggests that the choice of T segment correlates with which arm possesses the more extensive set of phased anisotropic bending signals, with the Mu right arm possessing an unusually extended set of such signals. The implications of these observations for the structure of the gyrase-DNA complex and for the biological function of the Mu SGS are discussed.

Bacteriophage mu↗

Chromosomal integration mechanism of infecting mu virion DNA.

DNA transposition is central to the propagation of temperate phage Mu. A long-standing problem in Mu biology has been the mechanism by which the linear genome of an infecting phage, which is linked at both ends to DNA acquired from a previous host, integrates into the new host chromosome. If Mu were to use its well-established cointegrate mechanism for integration (single-strand nicks at Mu ends, joined to a staggered double-strand break in the target), the flanking host sequences would remain linked to Mu; target-primed replication of the linear integrant would subsequently break the chromosome. The absence of evidence for chromosome breaks has led to speculation that infecting Mu might use a cut-and-paste mechanism, whereby Mu DNA is cut away from the flanking sequences prior to integration. In this study we have followed the fate of the flanking DNA during the time course of Mu infection. We have found that these sequences are still attached to Mu upon integration and that they disappear soon after. The data rule out a cut-and-paste mechanism and suggest that infecting Mu integrates to generate simple insertions by a variation of its established cointegrate mechanism in which, instead of a "nick, join, and replicate" pathway, it follows a "nick, join, and process" pathway. The results show similarities with human immunodeficiency virus integration and provide a unifying mechanism for development of Mu along either the lysogenic or lytic pathway.

Bacteriophage mu↗