PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7900302

Context effects on perceived position: sustained and transient temporal influences on spatial interactions.

Abstract

The effects of sustained and transient responses to inducing lines on the perceived position of nearby test lines were measured as constant errors in the vernier alignment of the test lines. The sustained response to the continued presence of the inducing lines had no effect on the perceived position of the test lines for very small inducing/test-line distances, and a repulsive effect for larger distances. Transient responses to the onset of the inducing lines had attractive effects for small distances, whereas transient responses to the offset of the inducing lines had repulsive effects for all distances tested. Attraction and repulsion effects on perceived position are accounted for by facilitating and inhibiting interactions that influence the relative sensitivities of an ensemble of position-selective detecting units.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H S Hock, K E Eastman. 1995. Context effects on perceived position: sustained and transient temporal influences on spatial interactions.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)00152-c

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Localization of visual targets during optokinetic eye movements.

We investigated localization of brief visual targets during reflexive eye movements (optokinetic nystagmus). Subjects mislocalized these targets in the direction of the slow eye movement. This error decreased shortly before a saccade and temporarily increased afterwards. The pattern of mislocalization differs markedly from mislocalization during voluntary eye movements in the presence of visual references, but (spatially) resembles mislocalization during voluntary eye movements in darkness. Because neither reflexive eye movements nor voluntary eye movements in darkness have explicit (visual) goals, these data support the view that visual goals support perceptual stability as an important link between pre- and post-saccadic scenes.

Fixation, Ocular↗

Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading.

Saccadic eye movements and fixations are the behavioral means by which we visually sample text during reading. Human oculomotor control is governed by a complex neurophysiological system involving the brain stem, superior colliculus, and several cortical areas. A very widely held belief among researchers investigating primate vision is that the oculomotor system serves to orient the visual axes of both eyes to fixate the same target point in space. It is argued that such precise positioning of the eyes is necessary to place images on corresponding retinal locations, such that on each fixation a single, nondiplopic, visual representation is perceived. Vision works actively through a continual sampling process involving saccades and fixations. Here we report that during normal reading, the eyes do not always fixate the same letter within a word. We also demonstrate that saccadic targeting is yoked and based on a unified cyclopean percept of a whole word since it is unaffected if different word parts are delivered exclusively to each eye via a dichoptic presentation technique. These two findings together suggest that the visual signal from each eye is fused at a very early stage in the visual pathway, even when the fixation disparity is greater than one character (0.29 deg), and that saccade metrics for each eye are computed on the basis of that fused signal.

Fixation, Ocular↗