PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7908566

[Appendicular lithiasis].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Drăgoi, G Popescu. 1993. [Appendicular lithiasis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7908566/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized, controlled trials.

PURPOSE: A randomized, controlled trial is considered to be the "gold standard" to evaluate a new procedure. Thus, this critical review assessed whether the published randomized trials on laparoscopic appendectomy show that it is superior to the open approach. METHODS: Twelve original articles involving a randomized, controlled trial on laparoscopic appendectomy in adults published between January 1990 and December 1996 were selected. We studied first whether each trial was positive (a procedure is superior to the other) or negative (no difference). We reviewed for each trial the methodology used and the following outcomes: operating time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, time until resumption of diet, postoperative pain, hospital stay, cost, and quality of life analyses. Postoperative morbidity was considered as the major primary outcome. RESULTS: There were six positive and six negative trials. Postoperative complication rates were similar, but the two approaches had specific potential complications, wound infections following open appendectomy, and intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic appendectomy. This review failed to show a superiority of the laparoscopy for the other outcomes, particularly postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Differences in positive trials concerned subjective and controversial outcomes, and the flaw in negative trials was their lack of power. Thus, nothing is definitively well established, even after 12 randomized trials.

Appendectomy

[Simplified appendectomy without stump embedding. Experiences of 20 years conventional and 5 years laparoscopic application].

Since 1975, the Department of Surgery in the Grevenbroich Community Hospital (Germany) has applied a simplified technique of open appendectomy. The inhouse modified procedure without stump embedding has been performed in 3,448 cases to date. The same approach has been used in 1,463 laparoscopic appendectomies since 1991. In the laparoscopic procedure the stump is ligated solely with Roeder's loop. None of the 4,911 patients who have undergone either open or laparoscopic appendectomy have developed stump inadequacy or stercoral fistulae. According to the special literature, the complication rate after appendectomies without stump embedding is lower than that after standard procedures. In retrospect, laparoscopic appendectomy with simple ligation has confirmed the results achieved with simple ligation in open appendectomies. The technique should therefore become more common practice in open appendectomies, as well.

Appendectomy