PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7926355

Fax/modem board communications decrease preceptor communication costs.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mail and the telephone are common communication links between departments of family medicine and their community-based preceptors. The availability of low-cost fax/modem boards offers the potential for new communication methods. This study compares the cost of personal computer-based fax/modem board communications with traditional mail and telephone linkages. METHODS: The department's community preceptor faculty served as the study population. Sixty-eight physicians (54%) had fax machines; these physicians received faxes instead of mailed communications. The remaining 59 physicians (46%) received mailed communications. All preceptors received standard telephone calls. Costs for telephone, mail, and fax/modem board communications were tracked over a 4-month period. RESULTS: Faxes were significantly less expensive and more efficient than either telephone or mail communications. Telephone communications were the most expensive. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that fax/modem boards offer a communication linkage with preceptors that is more economical than either mail or telephone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D R Cole, M S Johnson, C J Heaton, M Petti. Fax/modem board communications decrease preceptor communication costs.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7926355/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cost benefit analysis of sexually transmitted diseases.

Suggested measures to prevent transmission and sequelae of sexually transmitted diseases are almost universally agreed. But the important question to be answered is whether the interventions are worth the resources spent. To facilitate the decision making on resource allocation, the best possible information should be available concerning the relationships between health intervention programs and changes in the health status. Cost benefit analysis is the main approach used to assess the efficiency of any intervention. If the economic benefits of the program are greater than the costs, the program should be seriously considered. Although information about the costs of management of STDs is scarce in developing countries because of the complicated behavioral, social and economic issues involved, it is widely held that making treatment available for curable sexually transmitted diseases represents one of the most cost-effective ways to improve the health in the world.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated? A cost-utility analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated considering the risks. benefits, and costs. BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms are commonly treated by surgical clipping or endovascular coil embolization to prevent subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis comparing surgical clipping and endovascular coil embolization with no treatment for unruptured aneurysms. Eight clinical scenarios were defined based on aneurysm size, symptoms, and history of SAH from a different aneurysm. Health outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old women were modeled over the projected lifetime of the cohort. Costs were assessed from the societal perspective. We compared net quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost per QALY of each therapy to no treatment. RESULTS: For an asymptomatic unruptured aneurysm less than 10 mm in diameter in patients with no history of SAH from a different aneurysm, both procedures resulted in a net loss in QALYs, and confidence intervals (CI) were not compatible with a benefit from treatment (clipping, loss of 1.6 QALY [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; coiling, loss of 0.6 QALY [95% CI 0.2 to 0.8]). For larger aneurysms (> or = 10 mm), those producing symptoms by compressing neighboring nerves and brain structures, or in patients with a history of SAH from a different aneurysm, treatment was cost-effective. Coiling appeared more effective and cost-effective than clipping but these differences depended on relatively uncertain model parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of small, asymptomatic, unruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients without a history of SAH worsens clinical outcomes, and thus is neither effective nor cost-effective. For aneurysms that are > or = 10 mm or symptomatic, or in patients with a history of SAH, treatment appears to be cost-effective.

Cost-Benefit Analysis