PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7936973

Texture capture in Necker cubes.

Abstract

Texture capture can be based on illusory contours, stereopsis, outline figures, real movement, and apparent movement. Several figures are presented that demonstrate texture capture by the use of the pictorial depth cues of the Necker cube. The textures seem affixed to the sides of the cube, follow the alternations of the cube, and extend off the picture plane. A concomitant phenomenon is a subjective rarefaction of the texture in the cube. It is suggested that boundary cues determine the assignation of texture to surfaces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G E Meyer, C E Howard. 1994. Texture capture in Necker cubes.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p230029

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision.

Human foveal vision is subserved initially by groups of spatial, temporal and orientational 'filters', the outputs of which are combined to define perceptual objects. Although a great deal is known about the filtering properties of individual cortical cells, relatively little is known about the nature of this 'linking' process. One recent approach has shown that the process can be thought of in terms of an association field whose strength is determined conjointly by the orientation and distance of the object. Here we describe a fundamental difference in this feature-linking process in central and peripheral parts of the visual field, which provides insight into the ways that foveal and peripheral visual perception differ. In the fovea, performance can be explained only by intercellular linking operations whereas in the periphery intracellular filtering will suffice. This difference represents a substantial economy in cortical neuronal processing of peripheral visual information and may allow a recent theory of intercellular binding to be tested.

Form Perception

Model-based interpretation of complex and variable images.

The ultimate goal of machine vision is image understanding-the ability not only to recover image structure but also to know what it represents. By definition, this involves the use of models which describe and label the expected structure of the world. Over the past decade, model-based vision has been applied successfully to images of man-made objects. It has proved much more difficult to develop model-based approaches to the interpretation of images of complex and variable structures such as faces or the internal organs of the human body (as visualized in medical images). In such cases it has been problematic even to recover image structure reliably, without a model to organize the often noisy and incomplete image evidence. The key problem is that of variability. To be useful, a model needs to be specific-that is, to be capable of representing only 'legal' examples of the modelled object(s). It has proved difficult to achieve this whilst allowing for natural variability. Recent developments have overcome this problem; it has been shown that specific patterns of variability in shape and grey-level appearance can be captured by statistical models that can be used directly in image interpretation. The details of the approach are outlined and practical examples from medical image interpretation and face recognition are used to illustrate how previously intractable problems can now be tackled successfully. It is also interesting to ask whether these results provide any possible insights into natural vision; for example, we show that the apparent changes in shape which result from viewing three-dimensional objects from different viewpoints can be modelled quite well in two dimensions; this may lend some support to the 'characteristic views' model of natural vision.

Form Perception

Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy.

Many models of object identification are bottom-up and serial in nature; processing at a first stage needs to be complete before it is passed on to a subsequent stage, and there is no top-down feedback from the later to the earlier stages. However, data on picture identification in normal observers contradict a strict serial account of processing, since effects of variables on early and late stages of object identification combine in an interactive rather than an additive manner. Recent neuropsychological and functional anatomical data also indicate that object identification involves top-down activation of earlier stages of visual processing. In neuropsychological patients, subtle perceptual deficits can produce naming problems, even when there is good access to associated semantic knowledge; in functional activation studies, there is increased activity in visual processing areas when conditions require object naming relative to object recognition. These studies provide evidence that increased visual processing occurs in identification tasks, suggesting that there is re-current feedback during the identification process.

Form Perception