PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7940470

[Normative questions in veterinary practice: a survey].

Abstract

In autumn 1991, an inquiry was made among veterinary practitioners in the Netherlands to obtain information about the following normative questions: (1) which ethical issues are most troublesome in veterinary practice, (2) how do veterinary practitioners deal with ethical issues and (3) what is their opinion about the way ethical issues should be dealt with within the veterinary profession? Out of the population of Dutch veterinary practitioners (2155 persons) a questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 308 persons; 221 (72%) questionnaires were answered. One of the questions involved an inventory of ethical issues in veterinary practice. It is concluded from the results that ethical issues are perceived more as problems for the veterinary community than as individual problems. Moral problems in veterinary practice can generally be characterized as conflicts between interests and desires of animal owners and the moral responsibility for animals. In weighing interests of humans and animals the following animal dependent criteria can be distinguished: pain, health, welfare and integrity. Nearly all respondents (95%) answered that they would ideally take account of the welfare and/or integrity criterion, in addition to pain and health, in moral decision-making about treatment of animals. With regard to veterinary practice two important professional attitudes can be distinguished: an animal-oriented approach and a client-oriented approach. The survey revealed that the majority of practitioners (64%) give priority to the animal-oriented approach. Companion animal practitioners have a stronger animal-oriented attitude than farm animal and general practitioners, and female practitioners are more animal-oriented than their male colleagues. Regarding the process of moral decision-making, 78% of the practitioners want methodological support. The respondents prefer to be supported by means of discussion groups (51%) and post-academic education (34%). The survey revealed that 71% of the respondents are of the opinion that it is desirable that the veterinary profession takes a clear stand on particular ethical issues.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L J Rutgers, D B Baarda. 1994-09-15. [Normative questions in veterinary practice: a survey].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7940470/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Systematic review of comparative studies examining alternatives to the harmful use of animals in biomedical education.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the published literature for controlled studies comparing learning outcomes of traditional methods that require the terminal use of animals (eg, dissection, live-animal surgery, and live-animal laboratory demonstrations) with outcomes obtained with alternative teaching methods. DESIGN: Systematic review. STUDY POPULATION: Controlled studies published between 1996 and 2004. PROCEDURES: PubMed was searched with the following keywords, used alone and in combination: educational alternatives, nonlethal teaching methods, veterinary alternatives, medical education, and nonterminal animal use. Cited references of retrieved reports were reviewed to identify additional reports. Reports were selected for review only if a comparison group was included. RESULTS: 17 studies that were randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized trials that included a comparison group were identified. Five involved veterinary students, 3 involved medical students, 6 involved university undergraduate students, and 3 involved high school biology students. Sample size ranged from 14 to 283 students. Eleven studies appeared to be randomized, parallel-group trials, 4 involved comparative groups to which participants were not randomly assigned or for which the randomization process was not clear, 1 was a 2-period crossover study, and 1 involved a retrospective review of grades. In all 17 studies reviewed, results associated with the alternative method of instruction were not significantly different from or superior to results associated with the conventional method. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the number of controlled studies identified was small, the results seem to support more widespread adoption of alternative teaching methods in biomedical education.

Animal Welfare↗