PubMed · 7948758
Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods.
Abstract
Four cytology sampling methods were compared in 1063 patients referred for colposcopy with a recent abnormal smear. A dyskaryotic smear of any grade was considered a positive result, though comparisons were limited to cases with a subsequent biopsy confirming CINII or III. There were no differences between the abilities of any of the four methods to detect higher grades of CIN (chi (2)3 = 4.603, P > 0.20). The presence or absence of endocervical cells in a smear was not significantly associated with any variation in success rate (chi (2)1 = 0.959, P > 0.30). The joint analysis of the four methods and the presence/absence of endocervical cells also showed no significant effects (chi (2)7 = 12.768, 0.1 > P > 0.05). In the latter analysis the trend towards a conventional level of significance was accounted for by the Aylesbury spatula giving a relatively high success rate when endocervical cells were present. The suggestion of advantage for the Aylesbury spatula merits further investigation.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K S Metcalf, J Sutton, M D Moloney, L A Brown, K R Peel, A Baines. 1994. Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00423.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.