PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7952891

The chimeric mapping problem: algorithmic strategies and performance evaluation on synthetic genomic data.

Abstract

The Human Genome Project requires better software for the creation of physical maps of chromosomes. Current mapping techniques involve breaking large segments of DNA into smaller, more-manageable pieces, gathering information on all the small pieces, and then constructing a map of the original large piece from the information about the small pieces. Unfortunately, in the process of breaking up the DNA some information is lost and noise of various types is introduced; in particular, the order of the pieces is not preserved. Thus, the map maker must solve a combinatorial problem in order to reconstruct the map. Good software is indispensable for quick, accurate reconstruction. The reconstruction is complicated by various experimental errors. A major source of difficulty--which seems to be inherent to the recombination technology--is the presence of chimeric DNA clones. It is fairly common for two disjoint DNA pieces to form a chimera, i.e., a fusion of two pieces which appears as a single piece. Attempts to order chimera will fail unless they are algorithmically divided into their constituent pieces. Despite consensus within the genomic mapping community of the critical importance of correcting chimerism, algorithms for solving the chimeric clone problem have received only passing attention in the literature. Based on a model proposed by Lander (1992a, b) this paper presents the first algorithms for analyzing chimerism. We construct physical maps in the presence of chimerism by creating optimization functions which have minimizations which correlate with map quality. Despite the fact that these optimization functions are invariably NP-complete our algorithms are guaranteed to produce solutions which are close to the optimum. The practical import of using these algorithms depends on the strength of the correlation of the function to the map quality as well as on the accuracy of the approximations. We employ two fundamentally different optimization functions as a means of avoiding biases likely to decorrelate the solutions from the desired map. Experiments on simulated data show that both our algorithm which minimizes the number of chimeric fragments in a solution and our algorithm which minimizes the maximum number of fragments per clone in a solution do, in fact, correlate to high quality solutions. Furthermore, tests on simulated data using parameters set to mimic real experiments show that that the algorithms have the potential to find high quality solutions with real data. We plan to test our software against real data from the Whitehead Institute and from Los Alamos Genomic Research Center in the near future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Greenberg, S Istrail. 1994. The chimeric mapping problem: algorithmic strategies and performance evaluation on synthetic genomic data.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-8485(94)85015-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A note on a generalized single step theory for any number of hierarchical genomic matrices.

BACKGROUND: The Single Step algorithm allows combining information from genotyped and un-genotyped individuals, provided they are connected by a pedigree. However, current single step theory is limited to a single list of markers. RESULTS: We present a generalized single step (GSS) method that can accommodate any number of hierarchical molecular datasets (e.g. sequence, high and low density arrays) and pedigree, avoiding imputation. We prove that a similar efficient inversion algorithm exists. The method is recursive, starting with the highest marker density scenario. We illustrate the method with simulation and show that GSS can increase predictive accuracy compared to standard single step. R code is provided so that custom scenarios can be easily compared, either with simulated or real data. CONCLUSION: The method developed generalizes extant single step theory to any number of hierarchical molecular relationship matrices, broadening the scenarios where single step can be applied. A topic of particular interest can be ecology field data or human populations where pedigree is not available, but where samples sequenced and genotyped at different densities can exist. GSS can also be a useful tool to optimize allocation of genotyping and / or sequencing resources.

Algorithms↗

cgDist: Nucleotide-level distance calculation from cgMLST allelic profiles.

Bacterial genomic surveillance requires balancing computational efficiency with genetic resolution for effective cluster investigation. cgMLST distance calculations treat all allelic differences as equivalent units, obscuring nucleotide-level variation. Furthermore, single nucleotide polymorphism-based pipelines provide finer resolution at substantially higher computational cost, which limits their routine deployment in surveillance laboratories. We present cgDist, an algorithm that calculates nucleotide-level distances directly from cgMLST allelic profiles, providing finer resolution than allele-count distances by leveraging within-allele nucleotide variation. The cache architecture stores alignment statistics, enabling distance calculation modes without computation and supporting both dataset-specific and schema-complete cache generation. This design enables incremental surveillance analysis, with performance benefits as laboratories accumulate alignment data. cgDist functions as a precision 'zoom lens' for the investigation of clusters identified through initial cgMLST screening. Rather than restructuring population relationships, this targeted approach concentrates enhanced resolution where it is most informative. The algorithm ensures that cgDist distances are greater than or equal to corresponding cgMLST distances, preserving epidemiological interpretability while adding genetic discrimination. By increasing resolution within identified clusters, cgDist may also support outbreak investigation, a potential application that remains to be evaluated on outbreak-derived data.

Algorithms↗

Theseus: fast and optimal affine-gap sequence-to-graph alignment.

MOTIVATION: Sequence-to-graph alignment is a central problem in bioinformatics, with applications in multiple sequence alignment (MSA) and pangenome analysis, among others. However, current algorithms for optimal affine-gap alignment impose high memory and computational requirements, limiting their scalability to aligning long sequences to complex graphs. Practical solutions partially address this problem using heuristic strategies that ultimately trade off optimality for speed. RESULTS: This work presents Theseus, a novel, fast, and optimal affine-gap sequence-to-graph alignment algorithm. Theseus leverages similarities between genomic sequences to accelerate the alignment computation and reduces the overall memory requirements without compromising optimality. To that end, Theseus processes only a subset of the dynamic programming cells, using a sparse-data strategy that enables efficient sequence-to-graph alignment. Moreover, our algorithm supports optimal affine-gap alignment on arbitrary directed graphs, including those with cycles. We evaluate Theseus on two key problems: MSA and pangenome read mapping. For MSA, we compare it against SPOA, abPOA, and POASTA. Theseus is 1.6× to 17.6× faster than POASTA, and 7.3× faster, on average, than SPOA, both optimal aligners. Compared with abPOA, Theseus ensures optimality and scales to the largest problems. For pangenome read mapping, we benchmark Theseus against the alignment stage of the mapping tool vg map, along with the alignment kernels of SPOA, abPOA, and POASTA. Theseus outperforms the other methods, showing a 1.9× to 16.9× speedup on short reads. Moreover, Theseus is 1.5× to 36.3× faster than vg when aligning against synthetic cyclic graphs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Theseus code and documentation are publicly available at https://github.com/albertjimenezbl/theseus-lib.

Algorithms↗