Root coverage using a lateral pedicle gingival flap--a 22 year case study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer has been extensively studied, but no trial has unequivocally demonstrated improved overall survival with radiotherapy, despite a reduction in the rate of local recurrence. METHODS: Between March 1987 and February 1990, we randomly assigned 1168 patients younger than 80 years of age who had resectable rectal cancer to undergo preoperative irradiation (25 Gy delivered in five fractions in one week) followed by surgery within one week or to have surgery alone. RESULTS: The irradiation did not increase postoperative mortality. After five years of follow-up, the rate of local recurrence was 11 percent (63 of 553 patients) in the group that received radiotherapy before surgery and 27 percent (150 of 557) in the group treated with surgery alone (P<0.001). This difference was found in all subgroups defined according to Dukes' stage. The overall five-year survival rate was 58 percent in the radiotherapy-plus-surgery group and 48 percent in the surgery-alone group (P=0.004). The cancer-specific survival rates at nine years among patients treated with curative resection were 74 percent and 65 percent, respectively (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A short-term regimen of high-dose preoperative radiotherapy reduces rates of local recurrence and improves survival among patients with resectable rectal cancer.

Follow-Up Studies↗

PubMed1997

Long-term follow-up of hepatitis C virus infection among organ transplant recipients: implications for policies on organ procurement.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes slowly progressive liver disease. Therefore, the full impact of HCV infection after transplantation may require 5-10 years of follow-up. METHODS: We have previously reported the effect of HCV infection, acquired from the donor (study 1) or acquired before transplantation (study 2), on the incidence of liver disease, and on patient and graft survival with a median follow-up of 3-5 years. In study 1, we compared 24 recipients of organs from donors who were positive to antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) to 74 recipients of organs from anti-HCV-negative donors. In study 2, we compared 23 anti-HCV-positive recipients to 80 anti-HCV-negative recipients of kidneys from anti-HCV-negative donors. In this report, we extend the median follow-up period for patient and graft survival to 6-7 years, and discuss the implications of our finding on policies for organ procurement. RESULTS: In study 2, after extended follow-up, there continued to be no significant difference between groups with respect to graft loss, but mortality remained significantly higher among recipients with anti-HCV before transplantation. Compared with recipients without anti-HCV before transplantation, the relative risk of graft loss among recipients with anti-HCV before transplantation was 1.30 (0.66-2.58), the relative risk of death was 2.60 (1.15-5.90), and the relative risk of death due to sepsis was 6.30 (1.99-20). In study 1, after extended follow-up, there continued to be no significant differences between groups, with respect to graft loss or death. Compared with recipients of organs from anti-HCV-negative donors, the relative risk of graft loss among recipients of organs from anti-HCV-positive donors was 0.95 (0.54-1.67), and the relative risk of death was 1.00 (0.49-2.02). CONCLUSIONS: The two studies presented in this report provide an apparent paradox, with respect to the impact of HCV infection acquired at the time of transplantation versus before transplantation on posttransplantation clinical outcomes. However, the increased mortality among recipients who acquired HCV infection before transplantation, but not among recipients who acquired HCV at the time of transplantation, could be explained by the longer duration of HCV infection in the former group. These findings are consistent with the known slowly progressive nature of HCV infection. However, in the absence of definitive evidence for an adverse effect on patient or graft survival, we believe that the decision to accept a kidney from an anti-HCV-positive donor should be made by the patient, after discussion with the treating physician.

Follow-Up Studies↗

PubMed1997

Cost of long-term complications of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities: an analysis of a defined patient population in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the epidemiology and economic effect of long-term complications developing after deep venous thrombosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of, timing of, and treatment costs associated with long-term complications developing after deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities. DESIGN: 15-year retrospective cohort study. SETTING: County hospital in Sweden. PATIENTS: 257 patients with deep venous thrombosis and 241 age- and sex-matched controls without deep venous thrombosis. MEASUREMENTS: Data on use of health care resources and costs of inpatient and outpatient care, pharmaceutical agents, and treatment of complications. RESULTS: After 15 years of follow-up, 35% of the patients with thrombosis and 57% of the controls were alive. Two hundred forty-two complications were reported among the patients with thrombosis, and 25 similar events were reported among the controls. The average expected present value of the health care cost of treating complications of thrombosis was estimated to be about $4659 in the patients with thrombosis and $375 in the controls. In controls, primary deep venous thrombosis cost about $6000; thus, the additional long-term health care cost of post-thrombotic complications is about 75% of the cost of primary deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The economic effect of post-thrombotic complications is considerable. The use of measures to prevent thromboembolism and its long-term complications are justified on both clinical and economic grounds.

Follow-Up Studies↗