PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7958038

Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network.

Abstract

The Computer Assisted Touch Screen (CATS) and Computer Assisted Moving Eye Campimeter (CAMEC) are personal computer (PC)-based video-campimeters which employ multiple and single static stimuli on a cathode ray tube respectively. Clinical studies show that CATS and CAMEC provide comparable results to more expensive conventional visual field test devices. A neural network has been designed to classify visual field data from PC-based video-campimeters to facilitate diagnostic interpretation of visual field test results by non-experts. A three-layer back propagation network was designed, with 110 units in the input layer (each unit corresponding to a test point on the visual field test grid), a hidden layer of 40 processing units, and an output layer of 27 units (each one corresponding to a particular type of visual field pattern). The network was trained by a training set of 540 simulated visual field test result patterns, including normal, glaucomatous and neuro-ophthalmic defects, for up to 20,000 cycles. The classification accuracy of the network was initially measured with a previously unseen test set of 135 simulated fields and further tested with a genuine test result set of 100 neurological and 200 glaucomatous fields. A classification accuracy of 91-97% with simulated field results and 65-100% with genuine field results were achieved. This suggests that neural networks incorporated into PC-based video-campimeters may enable correct interpretation of results in non-specialist clinics or in the community.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Mutlukan, D Keating. 1994. Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network.. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1994.65

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.

BACKGROUND: New technology for computer-assisted screening of cervical smears that uses neural networks could potentially decrease numbers of screening errors and improve productivity. We assessed an interactive automated system (PAPNET) for primary screening of cervical smears. METHODS: In January, 1997, the National Health Service research and development programme sponsored a multicentre trial to investigate the use of PAPNET for classification of routine cervical smears as negative or needing further microscopic review. compared with conventional primary screening. The study complied with international standards for assessment of automated cervical screening systems. 21,700 smears were analysed by the two methods and were classified as inadequate, negative, mild, moderate, or severe dyskaryosis, invasion, glandular neoplasia, and borderline nuclear changes. 2906 abnormal smears and 298 negative smears were sent for independent cytological review (gold standard). We calculated sensitivity and specificity relative to the findings of the independent review. FINDINGS: Agreement of 89.8% between the two methods was shown for all classifications of smears that were adequate for reporting. The sensitivity was similar for correctly identified abnormal smears on PAPNET-assisted (82%) and conventional screening (83%). PAPNET-assisted screening showed significantly better specificity (77%) than conventional screening (42%) for identification of negative smears. The total mean time for screening and reporting for conventional screening was 10.4 min per smear, and for PAPNET-assisted screening was 3.9 min. INTERPRETATION: Use of PAPNET-assisted screening could increase quality and productivity. We recommend carefully organised and controlled development projects for the introduction of PAPNET-assisted primary screening of cervical smears.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

[Computer program for retinopathy of prematurity screening].

BACKGROUND: The goal of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is complete detection of all preterm infants with threshold ROP. AIM: We wanted to develop software to facilitate registration of ROP findings, checking due dates of re-examination, and evaluation of screening data. By means of complete and faultless registration and evaluation of the data of preterm infants, the effectiveness and safety of the screening should increase. METHODS: We developed software that runs under Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Windows 95 and is programmed in Microsoft Access Basic and Microsoft Visual Basic. The software allows all screening data to be registered and evaluated. Intuitive handling, third level of normalization in database architecture, and automatic plausibility checks guarantee the utmost integrity of data and efficacy of database. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: To date, the software has been used routinely in 2000 examinations in 1000 preterm infants. Our software facilitates clinical management and evaluation of ROP screening, which therefore becomes more safe.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted