PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7960176

Regional anesthetic techniques.

Abstract

Regional anesthesia has several distinct advantages over general anesthesia in the patient scheduled for ambulatory surgery. These include residual analgesia and a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. With appropriate choice of regional technique and local anesthetic drug, earlier ambulation and discharge are often possible. These advantages, however, may be negated by the use of excessive sedation. Careful patient selection is required to achieve optimal results. Regional anesthesia requires more time to administer than does general anesthesia, and ideally should be performed in an induction area. However, use of such an area, or employment of techniques with a rapid onset of analgesia (e.g., intravenous regional of spinal anesthesia) may actually reduce the total amount of time a patient spends in the ambulatory unit [16]. Selected application of regional techniques will help convince surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses of the advantages of regional blockade and may ultimately lead to greater patient and surgeon satisfaction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M F Mulroy. 1994. Regional anesthetic techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004311-199432030-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗