PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7960177

Monitored anesthesia care.

Abstract

The use of sedative and analgesic adjuvants during local and regional anesthesia can improve patient comfort while optimizing intraoperative conditions and increasing the range of procedures that can be safely and comfortably performed. Similarly, these techniques may be applied to procedures in which local anesthetic agents are unnecessary, or in which their administration is impractical. Although local anesthetic-based techniques are frequently perceived as safer than general anesthesia, the use of potent sedative-hypnotic and analgesic drugs (especially when used together) may cause significant depression of respiratory function. The need for vigilant monitoring, supplemental oxygen administration, careful titration of sedative-analgesic medications, and facilities and equipment for resuscitation is no different than when general anesthesia is employed. The availability of agents with more specific actions, shorter half-life values, and fewer adverse side effects, combined with a better understanding of drug actions and interactions, as well as new administration techniques, should make MAC safer and even more acceptable to patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Smith, E Taylor. 1994. Monitored anesthesia care.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004311-199432030-00008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗