PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7963006

Auditory facilitation: procedural or sensory effect?

Abstract

A few studies have reported that, under certain conditions, thresholds following exposure to a sound may be lower than those measured without prior stimulation. For example, Rubin [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 670-681 (1960)] found a 7-dB negative shift in threshold, for a 20-ms tone presented 160 ms after termination of a low-level cue tone. This "auditory facilitation" was obtained with an up-and-down psychophysical method. In the present study, auditory facilitation was reexamined using an adaptive, two-interval, two-alternative-forced-choice (2I, 2AFC) procedure. Thresholds were measured for 20-ms tones at 1 and 5 kHz, preceded by a 15-dB SL 80-ms cue tone of the same frequency. In addition, thresholds were measured with the cue absent. The results show that thresholds can be lower in the presence of the cue than in its absence, but the effect averages 0.5 dB or less and seems to be independent of cue-signal delay between 80 and 640 ms. Because this finding contrasts with the 7-dB facilitation, which Rubin obtained using an up-and-down method, part of his experiment was replicated and the results were essentially the same as his. The failure to find a pronounced facilitation effect with a 2I, 2AFC procedure indicates that the poststimulatory lowering of threshold found by Rubin primarily resulted from biases and criterion shifts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Miśkiewicz, S Buus, M Florentine. 1994. Auditory facilitation: procedural or sensory effect?. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗

Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: a PET study.

While persistence of subtle phonological deficits in dyslexic adults is well documented, deficit of categorical perception of phonemes has received little attention so far. We studied learning of phoneme categorization during an activation H(2)O(15) PET experiment in 14 dyslexic adults and 16 normal readers with similar age, handedness and performance IQ. Dyslexic subjects exhibited typical, marked impairments in reading and phoneme awareness tasks. During the PET experiment, subjects performed a discrimination task involving sine wave analogues of speech first presented as pairs of electronic sounds and, after debriefing, as syllables /ba/ and /da/. Discrimination performance and brain activation were compared between the acoustic mode and the speech mode of the task which involved physically identical stimuli; signal changes in the speech mode relative to the acoustic mode revealed the neural counterparts of phonological top-down processes that are engaged after debriefing. Although dyslexic subjects showed good abilities to learn discriminating speech sounds, their performance remained lower than those of normal readers on the discrimination task over the whole experiment. Activation observed in the speech mode in normal readers showed a strongly left-lateralized pattern involving the superior temporal, inferior parietal and inferior lateral frontal cortex. Frontal and parietal subparts of these left-sided regions were significantly more activated in the control group than in the dyslexic group. Activations in the right frontal cortex were larger in the dyslexic group than in the control group for both speech and acoustic modes relative to rest. Dyslexic subjects showed an unexpected large deactivation in the medial occipital cortex for the acoustic mode that may reflect increased effortful attention to auditory stimuli.

Auditory Perception↗