PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7965022

OFF response transformations in the whisker/barrel system.

Abstract

1. Previous studies have demonstrated marked differences in the relative sizes of ON and OFF responses of neurons in the whisker/barrel system. In particular, OFF responses are unexpectedly large in thalamic neurons. Extracellular unit recordings were used to examine whether varying the time between stimulus onset and offset differently affects OFF responses of neurons in the trigeminal ganglion, ventrobasal thalamus, and somatosensory cortical layer IV. Controlled whisker stimuli were used to deflect individual vibrissal hairs in different directions. We hypothesized that, in part because of the gradual waning of central inhibition evoked by stimulus onset, OFF responses of thalamic and cortical neurons but not trigeminal ganglion cells would increase in size with longer duration stimuli, with relative changes being greatest in the cortex. 2. OFF response magnitudes for thalamic and cortical neuronal populations increased as the stimulus duration was increased from 200 to 1,400 ms. Increases were greater at nonoptimal deflection angles. Similarly, individual cells having smaller OFF responses for the short-duration stimulus tended to display proportionately greater increases when the stimulus was lengthened. OFF responses of trigeminal ganglion cells were largely unaffected by stimulus duration. 3. Barrel neurons were subclassified as regular-spike units (RSUs) or fast-spike units (FSUs) on the basis of the time course of their action potentials. ON and OFF responses were smaller in the former and, when the stimulus was lengthened, percentage increases in their OFF responses were greater than those in FSUs. Results illustrate nonlinear transformations of the thalamic input signal by RSUs, which are presumed to be excitatory barrel neurons, and extend previous findings of response similarities between thalamocortical units (TCUs) and FSUs, the latter of which are thought to be inhibitory. 4. The time course of OFF response suppression in cortical neurons suggests that stimulus onset evokes central inhibition having two components, a potent one lasting several tens of milliseconds and a weaker one lasting many hundreds of milliseconds. Background activity levels in cortex and thalamus were diminished for > or = 1,800 ms after whisker movement. 5. For TCUs, 200-ms stimuli were less likely than 1,400-ms stimuli to elicit an OFF response, but when responses occurred they consisted of a greater number of spikes timed closer together. By contrast, the 200-ms stimulus OFF responses of the RSUs and FSUs displayed longer interspike intervals than did their 1400-ms responses, with no change in the number of spikes per response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H T Kyriazi, G E Carvell, D J Simons. 1994. OFF response transformations in the whisker/barrel system.. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1994.72.1.392

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Descending GABAergic projections to the mesencephalic locomotor region in the lamprey Petromyzon marinus.

The mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) plays a significant role in the control of locomotion in all vertebrate species investigated. Forebrain neurons are likely to modulate MLR activity, but little is known about their inputs. Descending GABAergic projections to the MLR were identified by double-labeling neurons using Neurobiotin injected into the MLR combined with immunofluorescence against GABA. Several GABAergic projections to the MLR were identified in the telencephalon and diencephalon. The most abundant GABAergic projection to the MLR came from the caudal portion of the medial pallium, a region that may have similarities with the amygdala of higher vertebrates. A small population of GABAergic cells projecting to the MLR was found in the striatum and the ventral portion of the lateral pallium, which could respectively correspond to the input and output components of the basal ganglia thought to be involved in the selection of motor programs. Other GABAergic projections were found to come from the thalamus and the hypothalamus, which could take part in the motivational aspect of motor behavior in lampreys. Electrophysiological experiments were also carried out to examine the effects of GABA agonists and antagonists injected into the MLR in a semi-intact lamprey preparation. The GABA agonist inhibited locomotion, whereas the GABA antagonist initiated it. These results suggest that the GABAergic projections to the MLR modulate the activity of MLR neurons, which would be inhibited by GABA at rest.

Afferent Pathways↗

Anatomical organization of antennal lobe projection neurons in the moth Heliothis virescens.

A prerequisite for understanding how odor information is coded in the central nervous system is to know the morphology and spatial relationship of the principal neurons forming the olfactory pathways. The present account provides an anatomical description of the morphology of the neuronal connections between the antennal lobe and the protocerebrum in the moth Heliothis virescens, a species used for studies of olfactory processing and learning. Intracellular labeling and antennal lobe focal injections with dextran fluorescent markers were combined with neuropil immunostaining and three-dimensional reconstructions. The experiments revealed four antennocerebral tracts, the inner, middle, outer, and dorsomedial, and eight morphological types of projection neurons in addition to a neuron with an unpaired median soma in the subesophageal ganglion. Multiglomerular projection neurons, present in all but the dorsomedial antennocerebral tract, project in several olfactory foci of the protocerebral neuropil. With few exceptions, these neurons do not innervate the calyces of the mushroom body. Uniglomerular projection neurons appear most numerous in the inner antennocerebral tract but are also present in the outer and dorsomedial tracts. These neurons always ramify in the calyces of the mushroom body and in the lateral horn. The projection areas of the neurons following different tracts are largely separated in the secondary olfactory centers. This is most evident in the lateral horn, whereas, in the calyces, the axonal ramifications are more intermingled. The mushroom body architecture, revealed by neuropil immunolabeling, showed striking similarities to that of other lepidopteran species as well as insects of other taxa.

Afferent Pathways↗

Vessicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 are differentially associated with auditory nerve and spinal trigeminal inputs to the cochlear nucleus.

Projections of glutamatergic somatosensory and auditory fibers to the cochlear nucleus (CN) are mostly nonoverlapping: projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5) terminate primarily in the granule cell domains (GCD) of CN, whereas type I auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) project to the magnocellular areas of the VCN (VCNm) and deep layers of Dorsal CN (DCN). Vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs), which selectively package glutamate into synaptic vesicles, have different isoforms associated with distinct subtypes of excitatory glutamatergic neurons. Here we examined the distributions of VGLUT1 and VGLU2 expression in the CN and their colocalization with Sp5 and ANF terminals following injections of anterograde tracers into Sp5 and the cochlea in the guinea pig. The CN regions that showed the most intense expression of VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 were largely nonoverlapping and were consistent with ANF and Sp5 projections, respectively: VGLUT1 was highly expressed in VCNm and the molecular layer of the DCN, whereas VGLUT2 was expressed predominantly in the GCD. Half (47% +/- 3%) of the Sp5 mossy fiber endings colabeled with VGLUT2, but few (2.5% +/- 1%) colabeled with VGLUT1. In contrast, ANFs colabeled predominantly with VGLUT1. The pathway-specific expression of VGLUT isoforms in the CN may be associated with the intrinsic synaptic properties that are unique to each sensory pathway.

Afferent Pathways↗