PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7971301

Predicting metabolic control in diabetes: a pilot study using meta-analysis to estimate a linear model.

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of using data from replicated descriptive studies to test a four-variable model designed to explain metabolic control in diabetes. Predictors of metabolic control selected for this analysis were knowledge; health beliefs (and the subscales of barriers, commitment, cues, expectancies, impact on lifestyle, support, and susceptibility); and compliance/adherence. A total of 17 studies, published between 1982 and 1991, were located that met inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that health beliefs have direct and indirect effects on diabetes metabolic control, depending on the individual health belief subscale analyzed. For example, commitment to the benefits of therapy was found to have a statistically significant direct effect on metabolic control; barriers had a statistically significant indirect effect through compliance. The effects of knowledge were consistent throughout the five path models explored. An inverse direct effect was noted on metabolic control and a positive indirect effect was noted on metabolic control through compliance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Brown, L V Hedges. Predicting metabolic control in diabetes: a pilot study using meta-analysis to estimate a linear model.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7971301/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗