PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7977963

Classification of neck dissection: variations on a new theme.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Commencing in 1984, we initiated a head and neck service surgical database that included a classification system for neck dissection. The aim was to reduce the confusion in terminology resulting from growing interest in modifications of conventional radical neck dissection. METHODS: We considered a neck dissection as radical when four or five lymph node levels were excised; this included patients who had an otherwise classical neck dissection for supraglottic larynx or hypopharyngeal cancer sparing level 1. Lymph-node levels removed, nonlymphatic structures preserved, and excised nonlymphatic structures not ordinarily included in a classical radical neck dissection were all specified by the operating surgeon. We defined as a selective neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that encompassed no more than three nodal levels, usually supraomohyoid (levels 1, 2, 3), or jugular (levels 2, 3, 4). We defined as a limited neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that involved removal of no more than two nodal levels. RESULTS: At the 10-year mark, this database of 10,650 patients now includes 2,635 lymphadenectomies in 2,426 patients, the precise extent of which is accurately described in each patient. CONCLUSIONS: The current classification of neck dissection does not cover all possibilities. If we define as radical those lymphadenectomies that resect four or five nodal levels and specify structures preserved or additional nonlymphatic structures sacrificed, we allow for the possibility that some procedures may be both modified and extended. Selective would describe the standard, three-level dissections (eg, supraomohyoid or jugular node dissections), and the term limited would be introduced to indicate a neck dissection that involves removal of no more than two nodal levels. Such a three-tiered classification would more accurately reflect the time and effort involved and provide a more equitable basis for reimbursement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Spiro, E W Strong, J P Shah. 1994. Classification of neck dissection: variations on a new theme.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80088-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Nonpromoter methylation of the CDKN2A gene with active transcription is associated with improved locoregional control in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

We previously reported a novel association between CDKN2A nonpromoter methylation and transcription (ARF/INK4a) in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal tumors. In this study we assessed whether nonpromoter CDKN2A methylation in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas (LXSCC) conferred a similar association with transcription that predicted patient outcome. We compared DNA methylation and ARF/INK4a RNA expression levels for the CDKN2A locus using the Illumina HumanMethylation27 beadchip and RT-PCR in 43 LXSCC tumor samples collected from a prospective study of head and neck cancer patients treated at Montefiore Medical Center (MMC). Validation was performed using RNAseq data on 111 LXSCC tumor samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The clinical relevance of combined nonpromoter CDKN2A methylation and transcription was assessed by multivariate Cox regression for locoregional recurrence on a subset of 69 LXSCC patients with complete clinicopathologic data from the MMC and TCGA cohorts. We found evidence of CDKN2A nonpromoter hypermethylation in a third of LXSCC from our MMC cohort, which was significantly associated with increased ARF and INK4a RNA expression (Wilcoxon rank-sum, P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.007 and 0.003, respectively). A similar association was confirmed in TCGA samples (Wilcoxon rank-sum test P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001 for ARF and INK4a). Patients with CDKN2A hypermethylation or high ARF/INK4a expression were significantly less likely to develop a locoregional recurrence compared to those with neither of the features, independent of other clinicopatholgic risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio=0.21, 95% confidence interval:0.05-0.81). These results support the conclusion that CDKN2A nonpromoter methylation is associated with increased ARF and INK4a RNA expression, and improved locoregional control in LXSCC.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

HPV integration begins in the tonsillar crypt and leads to the alteration of p16, EGFR and c-myc during tumor formation.

The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is high in the oropharyngeal mucosal regions, of which the tonsil is the most commonly affected. There may be a link between HPV and the pathogenesis of tonsillar cancer (TC), because of common anatomical characteristics between cervical and tonsillar cancer. We aimed to clarify whether HPV directly affects the oncogenesis and biologic behavior of TC by making a comparison between infection prevalence, physical status and viral loading numbers, and clinicopathologic prognostic factors. To compare HPV-related molecules between TC and tonsillitis (CFT), p16, survivin, HIF-1alpha, skp-1, cyclin A, cyclin B1, c-myc and EGFR were investigated. We observed a significant difference in HPV prevalence between 52 TCs and 69 CFTs (73.1% vs. 11.6%), and most of the HPVs were type 16 (87.2%) and nonepisomal (94.1%). Most TCs associated with HPV arose from the tonsillar crypts, and tended to be inverted and poorly differentiated. Compared with HPV-negative TC, HPV-positive TC showed a strong association with p16 overexpression (p<0.0001), and an inverse association with EGFR amplification (p=0.0478). HPV-16 integration status was strongly associated with c-myc amplification (p=0.034) and HIF-1alpha overexpression (p=0.022). HPV-16 integration could be directly related to tonsillar carcinogenesis initially in tonsillar crypts, followed by cell cycle aberration such as p16 overexpression related to the G1-S phase.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗