PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7979076

Day case arthroscopy under local anaesthesia.

Abstract

A prospective study of the effectiveness of local anaesthesia in arthroscopy of the knee was performed in 212 consecutive patients. Arthroscopic surgery was undertaken successfully in 121 cases (57%), including meniscectomy and drilling of osteochondral defects. Dynamic evaluation of the patellofemoral joint articulation was possible and demonstration of pathological abnormalities was felt to be beneficial by some patients. The method described is safe, reliable, confers good postoperative analgesia and enables physiotherapy to begin immediately. Conversion to general anaesthesia was necessary in one case due to pain localised to a stiff and osteoarthritic hip. Intra-articular haemorrhage was found to be a problem in one case with synovitis. Only ten patients complained of moderate pain, none had severe pain. Local anaesthesia is contraindicated in cases with ipsilateral osteoarthritis of the hip or with significant synovitis of the knee. This technique is particularly suited to day case surgery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Wallace, A J Carr, A B Loach, J Wilson-MacDonald. 1994. Day case arthroscopy under local anaesthesia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7979076/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗