PubMed · 7979243
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A W Ford-Hutchinson, M Gresser, R N Young. 1994. 5-Lipoxygenase.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002123
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Leukotrienes are implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease. Recently two haplotypes (HapA and HapB) in the gene encoding ALOX5AP (arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein), the main regulator of 5-lipoxygenase, have been associated with a doubling of the risk of myocardial infarction. Studies have also shown that treatment with a leukotriene inhibitor reduces biomarkers of coronary risk in patients carrying HapA, raising the possibility of developing genotype-specific therapy. In the present study, we examined whether carriage of HapA or HapB is associated with increased LTB(4) (leukotriene B(4)) production in healthy subjects. Age- and gender-matched healthy HapA carriers (n=21), HapB carriers (n=20) and non-A/non-B carriers (n=18), with no reported history of cardiovascular disease, were recruited following DNA screening of 1268 subjects from a population-based study. Blood neutrophils were isolated, and LTB(4) production was measured in response to stimulation with 1 mumol/l of the calcium ionophore A23187. There was no difference in the mean level for LTB(4) production in the three groups (non-A/non-B, 24.9+/-8.3 ng/10(6) cells; HapA, 22.2+/-11.9 ng/10(6) cells; HapB, 19.8+/-4.8 ng/10(6); P=0.14). The findings indicate that if either the HapA or the HapB haplotype of ALOX5AP indeed increases cardiovascular risk, then the mechanism is not simply due to a systematically observable effect of the haplotype on LTB(4) production in response to stimulation. The results suggest that knowledge of a patient's haplotype may not provide useful information on the probable clinical response to ALOX5AP inhibitors.
Atherosclerotic involvement in the coronary arteries, which can result in heart attack and sudden death, is a common disease and prototypic of a complex human trait. To understand its genomic basis, eight linkage studies of sibling pairs have been performed. Although there was limited inter-study concordance of important loci, two gene variants in the leukotriene pathway (ALOX5AP and LTA4) have emerged as susceptibility factors for myocardial infarction (MI). Genome-wide association studies have also been undertaken, and the pro-inflammatory cytokine lymphotoxin-alpha (LTA), and its key ligand galectin-2 (LGALS2) have been identified as genes implicated in predisposition for heart attack. By cueing into the genomic basis for low serum LDL cholesterol levels, much work has been done to advance the importance of the serine protease PCSK9, which modulates LDL receptor function. Lifelong lowered LDL cholesterol associated with PCSK9 point mutations in 2-3% of individuals have been shown to provide marked protection from coronary artery disease (CAD). Most of the success in this field has been with the phenotype of MI, which is considerably more restrictive than CAD. Four principal and interdependent processes--lipoprotein handling, endothelial integrity, arterial inflammation, and thrombosis--have been supported as important via the clustering of genes, thus far implicated in CAD susceptibility. Of note, connecting genes in a single pathway (leukotriene), of a protein and its ligand (LTAalpha) or from one disease to another [age-related macular degeneration (AMD); complement factor H (CFH)], or even three disease characterized by inflammation (MHC2) have now been reported. Although the population attributable risk for any of the genes identified to date is limited, such discovery is likely to be accelerated in the future.
Pharmacogenomics is used to improve patient outcome by maximizing the likelihood of desired effects and minimizing the risk of adverse events using an individual's genetic profile. As such, pharmacogenomics can be used to improve current risk-management strategies (improving the risk-benefit balance). Two areas of great promise for pharmacogenomics in this regard are emerging: (i) the pharmacogenomics of modulating disease biomarkers (to provide insight into novel mechanisms of drug response and to identify the patients most likely to respond to a drug in a favorable way); and (ii) using pharmacogenomics to enhance drug safety. Given that novel biomarkers could enable the earlier detection of many diseases and more-widespread therapies for primary prevention, pharmacogenomics provides the opportunity to identify the patients most likely to respond to these therapies, thereby preserving valuable health-care resources. The use of pharmacogenomics in pharmacovigilance could also be useful for risk-stratifying patients and for helping to identify the mechanisms involved in adverse events.