PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7984395

Object-based apparent motion.

A Koriat
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The interpretation of a dynamic visual scene requires integrating information within frames (grouping and completion) and across frames (correspondence matching). Fragmentary views of objects were used in five experiments. These views could not be matched with each other by any similarity transformation on the basis of their explicit visual features, but their completed versions were related by a rotational transformation. When the fragmentary images were successively presented to observers, it was found that they produced apparent motion in the picture plane and in depth. Thus, apparent motion is capable of establishing correspondence at the level of perceptually recovered objects in three-dimensional space.

Explore related subjects

Depth PerceptionHumansMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationRotationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Koriat. 1994. Object-based apparent motion.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206731

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Stereoscopic segregation of transparent surfaces and the effect of motion contrast.

Stereoscopic segregation in depth was studied using two superimposed frontoparallel surfaces displayed in dynamic random dot stereograms. The two patterns were positioned symmetrically in front of and behind a binocular fixation point. They were either stationary, or they could move relative to each other. Sensitivity for segregation was established by adding gaussian distributed disparity noise to the disparities specifying the two planes, and finding the noise amplitude that gave threshold segregation performance. Observers easily segregate the two surfaces for disparity differences between approximately 6 and 30-40 arcmin. Motion contrast, which by itself provides no cue to perform the task, greatly improves sensitivity for segregation. Noise tolerance rises by a factor of two or more when the patterns move at different speeds, or in different (frontoparallel) directions. The effect increases with directional difference, but the optimal directional difference deviated from 180 deg. The optimal speed varies with disparity difference. Thus, motion and disparity must interact in order to resolve the two transparent planes.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1998

Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information.

We measured both the just-noticeable difference in time to collision (TTC) with an approaching object, and the absolute accuracy in estimating TTC in the following cases: only binocular information available; only monocular information available; both binocular and monocular information available as in the everyday situation. Observers could discriminate trial-to-trial variations in TTC on the basis of binocular information alone: the just-noticeable difference in TTC (5.1-9.8%) was the same for a small (0.03 deg) target and for a large (0.7 deg) target. In line with previous reports, when only monocular information was available, the just-noticeable difference in TTC was 5.8-12% for the large target. However, observers could not reliably discriminate trial-to-trial variations in TTC with the small target when only monocular information was available. When both binocular and monocular information was available, the just-noticeable difference in TTC for the large target was not significantly different from when only binocular or only monocular information was available. Observers could make reliable estimates of absolute TTC using binocular information only. Errors ranged from 2.5 to 10% for the large target, and 2.6 to 3.0% for the small target, all being overestimates. Errors for the small target were the same or lower than errors for the large target. Observers could make reliable estimates of TTC with the large target using monocular information only. Errors ranged from 2.0 to 12%, all being underestimates. Since monocular information did not provide a basis for reliable estimates of absolute TTC with the small target we conclude that, in everyday conditions, accurate estimates of TTC with small targets are based on binocular information when the object is small and is no more than a few metres away. Errors in estimating absolute TTC were lower in the case where both binocular and monocular information were available (as in the everyday situation) than when only binocular information or only monocular information was available. Errors ranged from 1.3 to 2.7%. An error of 1.3% approaches the accuracy required to explain the +/- 2.0-2.5 msec accuracy with which top sports players can estimate the instant of impact between bat and ball.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1998

Spatio-temporal vernier acuity.

The study of space-time vernier (STV) provides information on the spatio-temporal structure of the visual system in the same way that the classical spatio-spatial vernier (SSV) provides information on its spatial structure. The transposition of a SSV task into a STV one yields the following experimental format: an object (in the present case a Gaussian Blob) drifts with a constant velocity, V, disappears at x0, t0 and reappears after a variable duration delta t at a position x1 +/- delta x with x1 the correct position (given a constant V) and delta x the minimum (positive and negative) spatial offset discriminable from x0, i.e. the STV threshold. Observer's task is to specify whether the reappearance position is ahead of, or behind x1. The STV functions of delta t measured for 1, 5 and 10 deg/s reference velocities are linear with non-zero spatial and temporal intercepts at the origin. We refer to these x and t intercepts as dynamic dmin and tmin. Dynamic dmin is the smallest instantaneous displacement (infinite velocity) discriminable from a continuous drift, V. Dynamic tmin is the shortest 'motion stop' discriminable from the same continuous drift, V. To our knowledge these quantities have not yet been assessed. Estimated dynamic dmin increases with V. whereas tmin is more or less V independent suggesting that the motion sensors presumably involved in the STV task have peak spatial frequencies inversely proportional with V and a temporal frequency characteristic independent of V (at least within the studied range). The observed STV linearity with the spatio-temporal separation implies that the STV task is equivalent to a velocity discrimination. Two additional observations yield support to this conclusion. (i) The slopes of these functions yield velocities very similar to those discriminable from the reference V in a standard V-discrimination experiment. (ii) The predicted STV performances based on a decomposition of the task into two velocity discrimination tasks run as independent experiments are reasonably accurate.

Depth Perception↗