PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7991815

MR imaging instrumentation and image artifacts.

Abstract

Current magnetic resonance (MR) imaging systems use four basic types of magnets: permanent, resistive (electromagnets), hybrid (combines principles of permanent and resistive magnets), and superconducting (resistive-like magnets cooled to near absolute zero to achieve superconductivity). The first three have relatively low field strength (0.2-0.6 T) compared with superconducting magnets (2.0 T), but they cost less, have limited fringe fields, and have minimal sitting restrictions. Although current low-field-strength units have signal-to-noise ratios competitive with those of high-field-strength superconducting units, the latter still allow faster data acquisition. Use of shim coils improves the uniformity of the primary magnetic field and thus image quality. However, distortions may be incurred depending on the magnetic susceptibility of materials being imaged or chemical shift effect. Image nonuniformities can result from the interactions between the shim coils and gradient coils, which are used to create the high-performance linear gradients needed in many MR techniques (eg, gradient-echo and echo-planar imaging). The gradient coils must be shielded to prevent these eddy current effects. The imager must also be shielded from external radio-frequency signals, which can cause interference. Image degradation caused by respiratory motion, cardiac motion, and blood flow can be reduced by use of gating and special imaging techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Patton. 1994. MR imaging instrumentation and image artifacts.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.14.5.7991815

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗