PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7993056

Reconstructive options for maxillary defects.

Abstract

Reconstruction of the maxilla should aim to restore appearance, speech and occlusion. With modern reconstructive techniques and availability of an increasing variety of reliable tissue flaps, many of the traditional problems of treatment have been overcome. This paper reviews local and distant tissue flaps useful in rehabilitating an acquired maxillary defect of various dimensions. The local flaps discussed include flaps from the palate, cheek, tongue and the buccal fat pad. The distant flaps considered are the temporalis myofascial flap, pedicled cutaneous and myocutaneous flaps, and vascularized free flaps. Bony reconstruction of the maxilla with particular emphasis on restoring an anatomical alveolar ridge for occlusal rehabilitation by dental implants is presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L K Cheung, N Samman, H Tideman. 1994. Reconstructive options for maxillary defects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7993056/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Masticatory rehabilitation of tumor patients by endosseous implants. 10 year analysis].

A total of 409 implants was inserted into 83 consecutive patients, who had tumor-related intraoral resections of soft tissue and bone. A life table analysis was used to determine the survival rate of the implants placed over a period of 13 years. Log rank tests and a Cox regression analysis were employed to identify relevant effects of surgical parameters on implant survival. A total of 38 implant failures were encountered. Most of the losses (n = 16) occurred during the first year of functional loading. The cumulative, overall survival rate of implants was 56.5%. Previous radiation therapy, insertion into grafted bone or original jaw bone, and insertion into microsurgically revascularized grafts did not significantly affect the survival rates. In the Cox regression, only the timing of implant placement was significantly related to the survival rate in the group of patients with bone grafts (P = 0.0197), with a lower survival rate of 36.2% of primary inserted implants and 67.1% survival in the group with secondary implant placement.

Bone Transplantation

[Titanium magnets on implants as an aid in rehabilitation after tumor treatment].

After the resection of a tumor, many patients need a reconstruction with hard and soft tissue and also with sufficient dentures. Often, only little space is available for the implantation. Implant length and diameter have to be reduced, and the result is a change in the biomechanics with a possible mechanical overloading of the implant. We examined 52 tumor patients undergoing reconstruction with 189 implants. A new concept involving attachment with the help of magnets is presented, offering a satisfactory solution in these difficult cases after tumor resection and reconstruction.

Bone Transplantation