PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7996226

Reengineering hospitals using the "function follows form" model.

Abstract

The author discusses some of the problems and shortcomings of the process used by many outside consultants to assist hospitals reengineer their operations. The author calls this process the "form follows function" process because employees are involved extensively in redesigning job tasks (functions) that in turn change the organization's structure, positions, and reporting relationships (form). The author presents an alternative process called the "function follows form" model used by two consultants to assist six hospitals in a multihospital system reengineer their operations. The process resulted in documented quantifiable improvements in enhanced quality, service, and financial outcomes in the first year of implementation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Strasen. 1994. Reengineering hospitals using the "function follows form" model.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-199412000-00013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends.

AIM: To evaluate current clinical practice in the UK in the management of the anophthalmic socket; choice of enucleation, evisceration, type of orbital implant, wrap, motility pegging and complications. METHODS: All consultant ophthalmologists in the UK were surveyed by postal questionnaire. Questions included their practice subspecialty and number of enucleations and eviscerations performed in 2003. Specific questions addressed choice of implant, wrap, motility pegging and complications. RESULTS: 456/896 (51%) consultants responded, of which 162 (35%) had a specific interest in oculoplastics, lacrimal, orbits or oncology. Only 243/456 (53%) did enucleations or eviscerations. 92% inserted an orbital implant after primary enucleation, 69% after non-endophthalmitis evisceration, whereas only 43% did so after evisceration for endophthalmitis (50% as a delayed procedure). 55% used porous orbital implants (porous polyethylene, hydroxyapatite or alumina) as their first choice and 42% used acrylic. Most implants inserted were spherical, sized 18-20 mm in diameter. 57% wrapped the implant after enucleation, using salvaged autogenous sclera (20%), donor sclera (28%) and synthetic Vicryl or Mersilene mesh (42%). A minority (7%) placed motility pegs in selected cases, usually as a secondary procedure. 14% of respondents reported implant exposure for each type of procedure and extrusion was reported by 4% after enucleation and 3% after evisceration. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights contemporary anophthalmic socket practice in the UK. Most surgeons use porous orbital implants with a synthetic wrap after enucleation and only few perform motility pegging.

Consultants↗