PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8004595

Percutaneous large core breast biopsy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical excision biopsy is considered by many to be the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Fine needle aspiration biopsy is used by some radiologists and other physicians in an attempt to diagnose breast lesions nonsurgically. To overcome the drawbacks associated with both of these methods, the author and his coworkers have developed the image-guided automated large-core breast biopsy method. METHODS: All biopsies are performed using either a dedicated, prone stereotactic device or high-resolution near-field ultrasound equipment for needle guidance. A "long-throw" (2.3 cm) automated core biopsy device fitted with a 14-gauge needle is used to acquire five or more core samples from each lesion for histologic evaluation. RESULTS: The ability of percutaneous, image-guided, large-core breast biopsy to provide the correct histologic diagnosis of a breast lesion is equivalent to open surgical biopsy. The cost of large-core breast biopsy is one half to one quarter that of surgical biopsy. No adverse cosmesis or mammographic pseudolesion results. CONCLUSION: In an era of increasing cost restraints in health care, it is important to identify means by which the level of patient care can be maintained or improved at lesser cost. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy provides that opportunity in the diagnosis of breast disease and should prove to be a cost-effective, reliable, and expedient alternative to surgical biopsy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S H Parker. 1994-07-01. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy.. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.2820741309

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗