PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8010338

Coffee: brew or bane?

W G Thompson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Coffee is the most commonly used drug in the United States. The medical literature is conflicted regarding the harmful effects of coffee and caffeine. Because the articles that have appeared are so different, a formal meta-analysis is not the ideal way to summarize the data. However, this literature review suggests that coffee does not have an appreciable effect on hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, or cancer. The effects of decaffeinated coffee are much less well-defined, and there is little rationale for recommending that patients switch to decaffeinated coffee. A less appreciated problem with caffeine is that it may increase the risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture.

Explore related subjects

CaffeineCardiovascular DiseasesCoffeeHip FracturesHumansLipidsNeoplasmsRisk FactorsTeaJournal ArticleMeta-Analysis

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W G Thompson. 1994. Coffee: brew or bane?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199407000-00011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

The crystal structure of anhydrous beta-caffeine as determined from X-ray powder-diffraction data.

The crystal structure of the low-temperature form of anhydrous caffeine has been determined by using X-ray powder-diffraction data with a combined simulated-annealing/Rietveld method. Anhydrous caffeine crystallizes with five crystallographically independent molecules in a monoclinic C-centred unit cell with dimensions of a=43.0390(17), b=15.0676(6) and c=6.95314(14) A and a beta angle of 99.027(2) degrees.

Caffeine↗
PubMed2007

Variability in human skin permeability in vitro: comparing penetrants with different physicochemical properties.

Appreciating and compensating for the inherent variability associated with percutaneous absorption is essential in optimizing (trans)dermal therapy. In this study, the variability in human skin permeability associated with model penetrants of differing lipophilicity (caffeine (CF), methyl paraben (MP), and butyl paraben (BP)) was examined in a standardized intra-laboratory study (Franz cell experiments) using epidermal tissue from various donors. Experimentally derived permeability coefficients (K(P)) were also compared to that derived from two skin permeation models namely, Potts & Guy and Robinson (revised) models in order to further validate the Franz diffusion method employed and also elucidate the potential permeation pathway(s) employed by the model penetrants. Intra-subject variability associated with skin permeation of the model penetrants was generally found to be lower than inter-subject variability. Experimental K(P) values were found to be the same order of magnitude as predicted by the mathematical models. Calculated residual variance suggested the Potts and Guy's model to be relatively accurate in predicting skin permeability of the two parabens whilst the Robinson (revised) model was more effective for CF. The high variability in CF permeation compared to the parabens may suggest the in vitro skin permeation of solutes becomes more sensitive to intra- and/or inter-subject variation in skin lipid content, appendageal density, and imperfections (pores, cracks) as the hydrophilic nature of the solute increases. Such variability in skin permeability suggests a difference in CF permeation kinetics relative to the parabens. As such when performing in vitro drug permeation studies, it is essential that the variability in the absorption of the model permeants, according to their physicochemical properties, is considered when they are used to normalize or standardize any resulting data.

Caffeine↗