PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8012430

Research on patient compliance in developing countries.

Abstract

Patient compliance with health care provider advice is a subject of particular importance in developing countries, one that has not been sufficiently studied. This article begins by explaining why this type of research is important and describing the various methodologies used to examine patient compliance in developed nations--notably self-reporting by the patient, collateral reporting by friends or relatives, pill or bottle counting, review of the patient's clinic attendance, review of clinical outcomes, and use of biochemical tracers. The applicability of each of these methods to scenarios commonly found in developing countries is then considered, and the results of the limited compliance research performed in developing countries are described. In general, it is suggested that self-reporting, collateral reporting, and pill or bottle counting can be employed effectively in many Third World situations. The article also notes the importance of standardizing research procedures, provides logistic advice about applying various compliance research methods in Third World conditions, and points up the need to validate the accuracy of the methods used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Homedes, A Ugalde. 1994. Research on patient compliance in developing countries.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8012430/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗