PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8014314

Nurses' medication errors.

Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative study of nurses' experiences with medication errors. Using discourse analysis within a framework of an interpretive research design, the phenomenon of a not too uncommon occurrence in nursing practice was examined. Insight into nurses' involvement with medication errors was gained from interviews, group discussions and self-reports. Documents of disciplinary proceedings, where the Professional Conduct Committee of the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting has dealt with incidents of medication errors, supplemented the data. Decisions made in situations of medication errors have moral implications at personal, institutional, and professional levels. The moral courage that is needed to learn from mistakes can be enhanced through honest dealings with the situation. Where the attention is shifted from the person involved onto the problem at hand, fair judgement may be advanced and the fear of owning up to a mistake be diminished. Only when reflected upon, can personal experience merge into the stream of development and progress. This study contributes to such reflection. Three key issues are discussed in-depth as they evolved during analysis of the data: These issues deal with identification and change; with guilt and shame and the reconciliation with human precariousness; and with teaching and learning. The manner in which discourse analysis was used here represents an innovative attempt to advance qualitative methodology in nursing research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Arndt. 1994. Nurses' medication errors.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01116.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Adverse life events and breast cancer: case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the strength of association between past life events and the development of breast cancer. DESIGN: Case-control study. A standardised life events interview and rating was administered before a definitive diagnosis. SETTING: Breast Cancer Screening Assessment Unit and surgical outpatient clinics at King's College Hospital, London. SUBJECTS: 119 consecutive women aged 20-70 who were referred for biopsy of a suspicious breast lesion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio of the risk of developing breast cancer after life events in the preceding five years after adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: 41 women were diagnosed as having malignant disease while the remainder had benign conditions. Severe life events increased the risk of breast cancer. The crude odds ratio was 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.35 to 7.6). After adjustment for age and the menopause and other potential confounders this rose to 11.6 (3.1 to 43.7). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that all severe events and coping with the stress of adverse events by confronting them and focusing on the problems significantly predicted a diagnosis of breast cancer. Non-severe life events and long term difficulties had no significant association. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest an aetiological association between life stress and breast cancer.

Adaptation, Psychological

[Intellectual and psychosocial functions in children treated with radiation for brain tumor].

Modern treatment has increased the survival rate for children with brain tumour, but treatment with radiation may lead to late adverse neuropsychologic effects. Also, peer problems may follow long periods away from school, and painful treatment and anxiety about the disease may mobilize emotional stress reactions. 16 brain tumour children with a mean age of 11 years (range 6-16 years), all of them treated with radiation, were tested with WISC-R. The mean time between diagnosis and study was five years (range 2-11 years). Parents and teachers completed the Achenbach check lists CBCL and TRF. Children below age four years at diagnosis achieved the lowest WISC-R IQs, the highest problem scores and the lowest social adaptive scores on CBCL and TRF. More problems were reported among the youth group aged 12-16 years than among the child group aged 6-11 years. Hypoactivity and low psychomotor speed seemed to have an adverse effect on both intellectual and psychosocial functioning. An almost normal communicative and reasoning ability was a resource for most of the children.

Adaptation, Psychological