PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 801815

Simplified anterior crossbite correction.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E C Carlson. 1976. Simplified anterior crossbite correction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/801815/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Crown foundations with a custom matrix, composites, and reverse carving.

This article describes a restorative technique for the formation of composite cores for artificial crowns. The procedure uses a semirigid matrix with reverse carving to form the cores on substantially compromised teeth. The matrix allows the placement of the composite under pressure to reduce voids and gaps and permits completion of multiple cores simultaneously. Reverse carving enables development of a common axis for multiple cores. The dentist can perform the tooth preparation for the crown at the time of the core restoration. The effort commonly applied to developing tooth morphologic features in the core can be invested instead in the formation of the interim restoration. The remaining tooth structure, pin or post placement, and location of the finish line can be evaluated with the insight of a crown foundation and not merely as a traditional restoration.

Composite Resins

Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to clinically assess marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. METHOD: Marginal defects with and without clinical evidence of secondary caries were evaluated by practitioners pre-operatively and after the restoration had been carefully removed. RESULTS: Analyses of 235 amalgam and 193 composite restorations with marginal failures showed that secondary caries was the most frequent diagnosis resulting in replacement. The secondary caries was predominately found along the gingival section of the restoration. A comparison of pre-operative diagnoses of marginal discrepancies, and the condition of the cavities at the site of the defects after the restorations had been carefully removed, showed fairly good consistency, but both false negative and false positive diagnoses were made. CONCLUSION: The observations indicated that diagnosis of the outer lesion of secondary caries provides a good basis for treatment planning.

Composite Resins