PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8019581

Sequential method of estimating the LD50 using a modified up-and-down rule.

Abstract

In this paper, the original up-and-down method, modified up-and-down method, the Robbins-Monro method, and a fixed-sample Spearman-Kärber method are compared for the point estimator as well as the confidence interval of LD50. In particular, three different designs of the modified up-and-down approach based on the combination of experiments on one test space and reduced test space are investigated. The standard normal distribution and chi-square distribution are used as tolerance distributions. Simulation results indicate that the modified up-and-down method tends to be somewhat better than the original up-and-down method in terms of the mean squared error under normal tolerance distribution. In case of chi-square distribution, the modified method is shown to be substantially better when the test space is wide and the initial dose is further away from the LD50.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Jung, S C Choi. 1994. Sequential method of estimating the LD50 using a modified up-and-down rule.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543409408835069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A case study of logistic QSAR modeling methods and robustness tests.

Acute toxicity (15-min EC(50)) determination of 16 substituted naphthalene compounds to Photobacterium phosphoreum was undertaken according to the standard procedures, while the effects of molecular structures of selected compounds on their toxicity to test microorganisms were logistically conducted using the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) technique. The relationship was developed as -log EC(50)=5.5916 (+/-0.1189)-7.4893(+/-0.4900)qH(+)+0.7771(+/-0.0619E(lumo)+0.0088(+/-0.0009)alpha(N=16, R(2)(adj)=0.9698, SE=0.0892, P=0.0000). The cluster analyses of individual structure descriptors as well as the quality control chart and Monte Carlo simulation test indicated that the prediction model was reasonable and robust even if tested with several different methods. Furthermore, the quantum chemical parameters entering into the QSAR model were used to discuss the possible toxicity pathways, and the results revealed that the selected compounds were reactive and their toxicity behaviors were complex processes containing physical partition stages as well as biochemical reaction stages.

Lethal Dose 50↗

A comparison of microbial bioassays for the detection of metal toxicity.

Heavy metal toxicity was studied by assaying six microbiological toxicity tests, both in solution and wastewater. Pseudomonas fluorescens and baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) were used; growth and respirometric determinations were performed. In addition, the Microtox test was employed as a reference method. The Microtox test is the most sensitive assay for detecting toxicity of zinc, copper, and mercury but not for cadmium, chromium, and nickel. Wastewater increases the sensitivity threshold (EC20) and EC50 values of the metals in most of the assays, which is correlated to the presence of organic and inorganic compounds that can reduce the bioavailability of the metals, leading to a general loss of sensitivity. All the above-mentioned assays are potentially useful in the detection of chemical toxicity of metals. However, each test shows different sensitivities to each metal, which is related to different sensitivities of the organisms used in the assays, as well as to other factors. Therefore, it would be advisable to use a battery of tests for biological evaluation of metal toxicity.

Lethal Dose 50↗