PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8027731

House call practices: a comparison by specialty.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been no national survey of physician house calls since 1980, and in particular, no survey of pediatric house calls in 30 years. This national study was undertaken to compare physician house call practices among family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians. METHODS: A mail survey was conducted of 1500 primary care physicians who were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Master File. Five hundred physicians were selected from each of three specialties: family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. RESULTS: Nine hundred six questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 59%. The percentage of family physicians making house calls was significantly greater than that of internists or pediatricians (63%, 47%, and 15%, respectively). Factors associated with making house calls were: house calls being a common practice in the community, solo practice, specialty (family practice), sex (male), and practice location in the northeast. Physicians who agreed with the following attitudes were more likely to make house calls: (1) making house calls leads to high patient satisfaction; (2) house calls are important for good comprehensive patient care; and (3) house calls are satisfying for physicians. Physicians who agreed that making house calls exposes them to a significant malpractice risk were half as likely to make house calls. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians made significantly more house calls than internists or pediatricians.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Adelman, L Fredman, A L Knight. 1994. House call practices: a comparison by specialty.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8027731/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗