PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8028327

Speech enhancement based on a sinusoidal model.

Abstract

Sinusoidal modeling is a new procedure for representing the speech signal. In this approach, the signal is divided into overlapping segments, the Fourier transform computed for each segment, and a set of desired spectral peaks is identified. The speech is then resynthesized using sinusoids that have the frequency, amplitude, and phase of the selected peaks, with the remaining spectral information being discarded. Using a limited number of sinusoids to reproduce speech in a background of multi-talker speech babble results in a speech signal that has an improved signal-to-noise ratio and enhanced spectral contrast. The more intense spectral components, assumed to be primarily the desired speech, are reproduced, whereas the less intense components, assumed to be primarily background noise, are not. To test the effectiveness of this processing approach as a noise suppression technique, both consonant recognition and perceived speech intelligibility were determined in quiet and in noise for a group of subjects with normal hearing as the number of sinusoids used to represent isolated speech tokens was varied. The results show that reducing the number of sinusoids used to represent the speech causes reduced consonant recognition and perceived intelligibility both in quiet and in noise, and suggests that similar results would be expected for listeners with hearing impairments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Kates. 1994. Speech enhancement based on a sinusoidal model.. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3702.449

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Factors governing prepulse inhibition and prepulse facilitation of the acoustic startle response in mice.

The influence of prepulses on the acoustic startle response (ASR) was measured in three inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6J, 129/SvHsd, and AKR/OlaHsd, and one hybrid strain produced by crossing wild mice and NMRI mice. Prepulse inhibition (PPI), i.e. reduction of ASR by prepulses, was maximal when the interval between prepulses and startle stimuli was in the range of 37.5-100 ms. Prepulse facilitation (PPF), i.e. increase of ASR by prepulses, was maximal when the prepulse preceded the startle stimulus by 12.5 ms. PPI increased with increasing prepulse SPL, PPF first increased then decreased when prepulse SPL was increased. Percent PPI was independent from startle stimulus SPL. All strains showed a long-term increase of PPI when tested for several days; one strain (129) also showed an increase of PPF over days. The present results clearly show that PPI and PPF are independent processes, which add to yield the final response change. PPF and the observed long-term changes of PPI and PPF are stronger expressed in mice than have been observed in rats under similar conditions. Since there were significant differences between the strains of mice with respect to PPI and PPF, genetically different strains of mice are a promising tool to study these two processes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Characteristics of behavioral abnormalities in alpha1d-adrenoceptors deficient mice.

To investigate the functional role of alpha1d-adrenergic receptor (alpha1d-AR) in the CNS, we have generated mutant mice lacking the alpha1d-AR using a gene targeting approach and examined in detail the effects of alpha1d-AR knockout mice on motor function, sensory function, and learning and memory. alpha1d-AR knockout mice showed better motor coordination at the highest rotating speed of the rotarod performance and stronger muscle tone using the traction meter, but their locomotor activity and swimming ability in the water maze were not affected. In the water maze requiring reference memory, alpha1d-AR knockout mice showed normal spatial learning. In the Y-maze task requiring working memory or attention, alpha1d-AR knockout mice displayed an impaired spontaneous alternation performance. The alpha1d-AR knockout mice tended to display lower levels of acoustic startle responses than the wild-type group at lower pulse intensities, although the acoustic prepulse inhibition was not impaired in the alpha1d-AR knockout mice. Furthermore, the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801-induced deficits of acoustic prepulse inhibition were not observed in the alpha1d-AR knockout mice. These results clearly demonstrate that the alpha1d-AR receptor plays an important role in the process of auditory sensory function, attention or working memory rather than reference memory, and the sensorimotor gating deficits induced by the NMDA receptor antagonist.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Reading with the ears.

We studied the cortical networks of Morse code reading with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Four expert radio telegraphists performed two closely matched reading experiments, one in binaurally presented high speed Morse code and one in print. Performance was equal for both conditions. Reading single nouns in Morse code resulted in predominantly left-sided activation of the frontal and temporal perisylvian language areas, prefrontal cortex, and premotor cortex. In a within-subject comparison between reading Morse code and reading print, the activation pattern in the left temporoparietal association cortex was similar for both forms of reading, suggesting that reading Morse code shares part of its cortical networks with reading print.

Acoustic Stimulation↗