PubMed · 8028807
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1994. AIDS update.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8028807/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
As part of the first quantitative study of men who have sex with men (MSM) and HIV/ AIDS in Spain, anonymous, self-administered questionnaires were distributed via gay/lesbian organization mailings, bathhouses, and sex shops in Barcelona. We analyzed 547 gay/bisexual men along self-reported HIV testing history-i.e. untested, previously tested HIV-, and previously tested HIV +. Eleven variables discriminated significantly between the three groups in multivariable analysis. HIV- men were over-represented in the mailing subsample. While untested men exhibited potentially protective behaviors (e.g. least likely to have had stable and casual sex partners with HIV/AIDS and to practice anal intercourse), they were also least likely to be out with their homosexuality and most likely to never use condoms when they practiced anal intercourse. HIV + men were most likely to report insertive and receptive anal intercourse with a condom and least likely to practice insertive anal intercourse without a condom in the past month, yet they were also most likely to report the highest interpersonal barriers to safer sex, recent cocaine use with sex, meeting sex partners in public restrooms, and recent episodes of STD. A potentially volatile combination of higher sexual activity (e.g. more sex partners and casual sex activity) coupled with the presence of safer sex barriers (e.g. poor scores on indices measuring safer sex disposition, elevated drug use accompanying sex) was evidenced among HIV + men. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups for anal intercourse without a condom, but with 37.5% of this collective reporting one such episode in the past month, all groups can be considered equally risky. Against the backdrop of a 20.5% self-reported HIV prevalence, there is considerable need for enhanced prevention efforts among gay/bisexual men in general and targeted strategies among HIV + men in particular.
More than 60,000 women in the United States have been diagnosed with AIDS, and millions of women worldwide are infected with HIV. Most of these women will die at an early age, leaving their children motherless. During their HIV illness, women confront the challenge of being both patient and family caregiver. Little research has explored this dual challenge. The authors conducted semistructured one-hour interviews with HIV-positive women that focused on the impact of the HIV diagnosis on the women's lives. Significant factors emerging from the interviews included the impact of stigma associated with HIV/AIDS, disbelief of the diagnosis, the lack of a guardian for their children, the paucity of women's support groups, and barriers associated with seeking services. All women exhibited evidence of clinical depression. A model for multidisciplinary intervention is proposed that focuses on women's needs within their family systems.
To investigate patterns of testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in tuberculosis patients, we obtained data from the tuberculosis registry and from medical records of 500 tuberculosis patients in Los Angeles County. Sixty-three percent of tuberculosis patients were tested for HIV infection, and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of testing was significantly higher among males, persons between 20 and 49 yr old, individuals with HIV risk factors, and patients treated by public health care providers. A minimum of 12% of the total sample, 2% of females, 2% of those outside the ages of 20 to 49, 7% of patients without recorded HIV risk factors, and 17% of patients treated by private practitioners were infected with HIV. These results suggest that health care providers, particularly private practitioners, do not follow national recommendations for universal HIV testing of tuberculosis patients. Instead, HIV testing is preferentially performed on patients perceived to be at high risk for HIV infection. Because HIV seroprevalence is at least 2 to 7% in "low-risk" groups, failure to test these patients may result in significant missed opportunities for diagnosis and treatment of HIV coinfection.