Coronary artery perfusion.

L L Michaelis

doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63855-6

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 803175

Coronary artery perfusion.

L L Michaelis

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Perfusion of the coronary arteries with oxygenated blood during cardiopulmonary bypass should in theory offer perfect myocardial protection, but the difficulties sometimes encountered with direct cannulation and the hazards of prolonged fibrillation in spite of perfusion raise questions regarding its universal efficacy. Arguments for and against coronary artery perfusion are presented and the hazards of partial perfusion are stressed.

Explore related subjects

Heart Arrest, Induced Heart Diseases Humans Hypothermia, Induced Intraoperative Complications Myocardial Reperfusion Risk Factors Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

L L Michaelis. 1975. Coronary artery perfusion.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63855-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Myocardial protection during surgical ventricular restoration.

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular restoration is a novel procedure for treating congestive heart failure (CHF). The two important features include a technically correct procedure and adequate myocardial protection. The two protective techniques include conventional cardioplegia and the beating heart. METHODS: This report reviews a RESTORE clinical registry and summarizes background experimental work related to myocardial protection in failing dilated hearts. RESULTS: The RESTORE registry is reported, where protection is 55% with cardioplegia and 45% with beating heart. The beating method was used more frequently in patients with ejection fraction <30%, end systolic volume 80 ml/m2, NYHA class >III/IV. Overall survival results favored cardioplegia except for the first 30 days, but after matching patients on age, ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA the beating results and cardioplegic results were comparable. Experimental work evaluated the safety of the beating method in failing dilated ventricles under acute conditions. Supplemental coronary perfusion studies in chronically dilated hearts after tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy were analyzed to show that (a) there was vascular remodeling (less flow at the same pressure in failing hearts with cardioplegic, but not beating delivery; (b) in the open state (used during restoration) subendocardial flow increased in the beating heart, and fell after cardioplegia. These studies were done without ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Cardioplegic delivery for protection is 'time dependent' (needing ischemic intervals) while beating nourishment is 'procedure dependent,' as continuous perfusion is provided throughout the procedure is suggested. The importance of maintaining high perfusion pressure is emphasized.

Heart Arrest, Induced↗

PubMed2005

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Heart Arrest, Induced↗

PubMed2005

Strategic leukofiltration in cardiac surgery.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with activation of molecular cascades, cell activation, accumulation of interstitial fluid, organ dysfunction and, occasionally, organ failure is still a commonly recognized consequence of cardiac surgery. SIRS leads to costly complications and several strategies intended to ameliorate the symptoms that have been studied, including leukocyte reduction, using filtration. Although, the body of work suggests that leukoreduction attenuates SIRS, discrepancies remain within the literature. The recent literature is reviewed highlighting the areas where concordance is lacking. In our study, on the basis of indirect indicators of SIRS, platelet function by thromboelastography biomaterial evaluation by light and scanning electron microscopy, we present our conclusions regarding clinical outcomes and the role of leukofiltration.

Heart Arrest, Induced↗