PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8034909

Medical education--using interactive learning.

Abstract

'... the undergraduate curriculum should seek to promote a more self-educative approach'. That statement by the General Medical Council in July 1990 coincided with the restructuring of the medical curriculum at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. One of the main proposals was the introduction of self-directed learning to reduce didactic teaching in the clinical years of the course. This has led to the development of interactive learning, using learning resources appropriate to the subject being delivered, and particularly to the introduction of computer-assisted learning. This represents a major change in the way medical students are taught, which has implications for all involved in medical education. For staff, it means taking a fresh look at the way they plan and present their teaching. For students, developing the ability to take responsibility for their own learning throughout their working lives can be a challenge but is of paramount importance for effective continuing medical education.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Chessell. 1994. Medical education--using interactive learning.. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453059409063662

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of computer aided learning in developing clinical decision-making skills.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether an educational intervention delivered by a computer aided learning package improved the sensitivity and specificity of dentists' restorative treatment decisions. METHOD: The study was a randomised controlled study using a Solomon three-group design. Ninety-five dentists were randomly allocated to the three study groups. One group of dentists read the radiographs pre and post an educational intervention, a second group read the radiographs once, after the intervention, and a third group read the radiographs twice, but received no intervention. On each occasion the dentists read 24 surfaces on each of 15 radiographs and made 360 decisions on how certain they were about restoring the tooth surface. Comparisons of mean sensitivity, specificity and areas under ROC curves were made within and between the study groups. Kappa values were used to assess changes in the level of agreement between dentists. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in sensitivity, specificity or area under ROC curves caused by the intervention. There was no evidence that the level of agreement between the dentists improved after the intervention. CONCLUSION: A computer aided learning package had no effect on dentists' treatment decision-making behaviour.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗