PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8035708

The dangerous practice of thinking.

Abstract

Information processing theory views thinking as the adaptation of activity to environmental inputs. A dual cognitive structure is proposed to explain this adaptation, in which thoughts are selected by interactions between an explicit memory system (accessible to consciousness) and an implicit memory system (inaccessible to consciousness). Contrary to commonsense assumptions about cognition, the implicit system plays the dominant role in skilled thinking. The explicit system has a largely regulatory function, overriding the implicit system when it encounters novel situations for which it has no response. Although the explicit system may be developed by cognitive process instruction in the classroom, the all-important implicit system is developed mainly by direct experience of the work environment independently of conscious information processing. Paradoxically, there are no grounds for declaring any part of medical science irrelevant to practical decision-making, as its effects on implicit memory are unknown. Nevertheless, it should be taught as the basis for regulating a process of thinking that is mainly implicit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N C Boreham. 1994. The dangerous practice of thinking.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02695.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.

Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing large bodies of evidence and helping to explain differences among studies on the same question. A systematic review involves the application of scientific strategies, in ways that limit bias, to the assembly, critical appraisal, and synthesis of all relevant studies that address a specific clinical question. A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of several primary studies. Because the review process itself (like any other type of research) is subject to bias, a useful review requires clear reporting of information obtained using rigorous methods. Used increasingly to inform medical decision making, plan future research agendas, and establish clinical policy, systematic reviews may strengthen the link between best research evidence and optimal health care.

Decision Making