PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8036097

Perceiving shape from profiles.

Abstract

Four experiments related human perception of shape from profiles to current theoretical predictions. In Experiment 1, judgments of structure and motion were obtained for single- and dual-ellipsoid displays rotating about various axes. Ratings were highest when the axis of rotation was in the image plane and were influenced by the number of ellipsoids and the orientation of a single ellipsoid. The subsequent experiments explored the effect of orientation on shape judgments of a single ellipsoid. The results of Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that the effect of orientation found in Experiment 1 was not due to either the inability of certain orientations to be perceived as three-dimensional objects or to two-dimensional artifacts. It was thus argued that this effect of orientation was due to points of correspondence in relative motion that arise when the major axis is not perpendicular to the axis of rotation. In Experiment 4, subjects provided judgments of both shape and angular velocity. The elevated ellipsoids that were judged as larger were also judged as rotating more slowly. The inverse relationship between size and angular velocity is consistent with current theories. The connection between theory and data was further demonstrated by applying a shape-recovery algorithm to the stimuli used in Experiment 4 and finding a similar tradeoff between angular velocity and shape.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F E Pollick. 1994. Perceiving shape from profiles.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211663

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Binocular visual surface perception.

Binocular disparity, the differential angular separation between pairs of image points in the two eyes, is the well-recognized basis for binocular distance perception. Without denying disparity's role in perceiving depth, we describe two perceptual phenomena, which indicate that a wider view of binocular vision is warranted. First, we show that disparity can play a critical role in two-dimensional perception by determining whether separate image fragments should be grouped as part of a single surface or segregated as parts of separate surfaces. Second, we show that stereoscopic vision is not limited to the registration and interpretation of binocular disparity but that it relies on half-occluded points, visible to one eye and not the other, to determine the layout and transparency of surfaces. Because these half-visible points are coded by neurons carrying eye-of-origin information, we suggest that the perception of these surface properties depends on neural activity available at visual cortical area V1.

Form Perception

The horizon-ratio relation as information for relative size in pictures.

The horizon-ratio relation was found to be an effective source of information for relative size in pictures under some conditions: when the difference in image size of depicted "same real size" objects was not too great (Experiment 1), and when the horizon line was not too high or too low in the picture (Experiment 2). The latter finding seemed to be linked to the observers' identification of the horizontal line as the horizon (and not as the edge of a finite surface). In addition, individual patterns of response were remarkably systematic even in the absence of a horizon, or any other pictorial information, (Experiment 3). It is suggested that in this case observers imposed a horizon on the picture on which to base their relative size judgments, possibly based on the observer's own eye level or on the content of the picture. It is concluded that although the horizon-ratio relation provides the same kind of information as that available in the optic arrays from real scenes, pictorial information requires the satisfaction of additional constraints in order to be fully effective.

Form Perception

Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding.

What are the elementary features that the brain uses to bind spatially distinct parts in a visual scene into an unitary percept of an "object"? The Gestalt psychologists emphasized the extent to which motion, colour, luminance or spatial arrangement contribute towards object formation. Little is known about the role of time per se, rather than motion, in constituting an object. In particular, does the visibility or saliency of an object change if the various parts making up the object are not presented simultaneously? Using a simple experimental design, we show that very small spatial displacements can significantly influence the saliency of an object while large temporal asynchrony has no significant effect.

Form Perception