PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8056549

Communication between GPs and psychiatrists.

F Smyth·J Owens·T Carey
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of GP referral letters to Specialist Psychiatric Clinics. Ninety one referral letters from 24 GPs were analysed. A schedule based on key items of information previously identified as being of importance to Psychiatrists was used in the analysis. The study revealed that these key items were frequently omitted. In addition, information on social history and medical history was inadequately supplied. Poor letter format and quality of notepaper were also identified. Liaison between GPs and Psychiatrists and Vocational Training Programmes would be helpful in addressing these issues.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationFamily PracticeHumansInterprofessional RelationsPsychiatryReferral and ConsultationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Smyth, J Owens, T Carey. Communication between GPs and psychiatrists.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8056549/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗