PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8066170

Day surgery--how much is possible? A Delphi consensus among surgeons.

Abstract

Although day surgery (DS) has been performed for many years, it has only relatively recently become a popular and acceptable method of treating many common surgical conditions. With considerable pressure to maximise resource usage DS has been seized upon as a way of stretching scarce resources further. A review of the amount of DS undertaken within the West Midlands region revealed that the current workload showed considerable variation both between districts and between consultants. In an effort to gain clinical commitment to increasing generally the amount of DS undertaken, and obtaining more uniform coverage of DS across the region, a consensus conference was held. The two aims of the conference were to set targets as to the amount of DS considered feasible at a procedural level, and to seek clinicians' views as to the obstacles to developing the service. Targets for 43 procedures at one and/or five years were obtained by the use of a modified Delphi consensus. The groups showed a high level of consensus in the targets reached. A variety of obstacles were discussed. We have shown that it is possible to involve a large number of doctors in the decision-making/target-setting process by using a modified Delphi technique. It remains to be seen whether those targets are met in clinical practice. Surprisingly, obstacles to development were mainly concerned with management and personnel issues rather than capital investment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Grainger, R Griffiths. 1994. Day surgery--how much is possible? A Delphi consensus among surgeons.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3506(94)80004-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗