PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8066276

Embolotherapy: agents, clinical applications, and techniques.

Abstract

For embolization to be successful, three factors must be addressed: embolic agent selection, clinical application, and technical skill. The major embolic agents used include stainless steel coils, absorbable gelatin pledgets and powder, polyvinyl alcohol foam, ethanol, and glues. Each of these agents acts at different levels in the arterial system; for example, coils are equivalent to surgical ligation and occlude medium to small arteries, whereas liquid agents and the smaller diameter particles occlude at the arteriolar level or the capillary bed. The type of agent selected should also be determined according to clinical application, which includes trauma, tumors, male infertility, impotence, and vascular malformations. It may be better to occlude an artery only temporarily, particularly in trauma patients, and absorbable gelatin material is preferred for this application. Conversely, permanent occlusion of arteries with either ethanol or polyvinyl alcohol foam particles may be necessary in the treatment of tumors. To use embolotherapy effectively, the interventional radiologist must be experienced, familiar with the underlying pathologic processes, and knowledgeable with regard to the role of other specialties in the treatment of the disease process presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Coldwell, K R Stokes, W F Yakes. 1994. Embolotherapy: agents, clinical applications, and techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.14.3.8066276

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Healing substrates with mobile, particle-filled microcapsules: designing a 'repair and go' system.

We model the rolling motion of a fluid-driven, particle-filled microcapsule along a heterogeneous, adhesive substrate to determine how the release of the encapsulated nanoparticles can be harnessed to repair damage on the underlying surface. We integrate the lattice Boltzmann model for hydrodynamics and the lattice spring model for the micromechanics of elastic solids to capture the interactions between the elastic shell of the microcapsule and the surrounding fluids. A Brownian dynamics model is used to simulate the release of nanoparticles from the capsule and their diffusion into the surrounding solution. We focus on a substrate that contains a damaged region (e.g. a crack or eroded surface coating), which prevents the otherwise mobile capsule from rolling along the surface. We isolate conditions where nanoparticles released from the arrested capsule can repair the damage and thereby enable the capsules to again move along the substrate. Through these studies, we establish guidelines for designing particle-filled microcapsules that perform a 'repair and go' function and thus, can be utilized to repair damage in microchannels and microfluidic devices.

Adhesives↗

Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of grinding on the bonding effectiveness of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive to fluorosed enamel. METHODS: The teeth were classified using the Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI). Fluorosed teeth (TFI=5) obtained from Isparta (Turkey) and control teeth (TFI=0) obtained from Leuven (Belgium) were used. Using a depth-marking diamond bur, 0.3mm of enamel was removed from mid-buccal and mid-palatal/lingual surfaces of the teeth, whereas the area adjacent to the ground area was left unprepared. A two-step self-etch (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray) and a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Optibond FL, Kerr) were used to bond the resin composite to the ground and unground enamel. Rectangular micro-specimens were prepared using the slow-speed diamond saw and tested in tensile to determine the micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS). RESULTS: The microTBS to unground fluorosed enamel was significantly lower than to ground fluorosed enamel for Clearfil Protect Bond (15.8+/-15.2 and 45.0+/-12.4MPa, p<0.0001) and for Optibond FL (35.5+/-21.4 and 50.5+/-12.3MPa, p<0.05), respectively. In control teeth, Clearfil Protect Bond bonded better to ground enamel (p<0.01), whereas OptiBond FL exhibited a similar bonding effectiveness to ground and unground enamel (p=0.0634). SIGNIFICANCE: Preparation of enamel improved the resin-enamel bond strength in fluorosed teeth. The bonding effectiveness to unground enamel was lower in fluorosed teeth than in control teeth for the self-etch adhesive tested.

Adhesives↗