PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8076301

[Stress, seen from outside].

Abstract

This article draws from the vast literature on stress in nursing and discusses the preoccupation that researchers and specialists have with this area. It asks the reader to take a moment to reflect on the types of stressful situations that nurses face on a daily basis. The authors focus on the potential tensions that can ensue following exposure to stress and the resulting psychosomatic, psychological, behavioral and organizational consequences. The authors challenge legislators, governments, administrators, members of the multidisciplinary team and nursing organizations to tackle the issue of stress in nursing and make it a priority. Research conducted during the last 20 years provides overwhelming evidence that nurses work in a high-stress environment. The sources of stress vary and their consequences are significant. However, it is recognized that certain personal factors such as type "A" personality can influence the way nurses deal with stress. Ultimately, the authors conducted their literature review with the aim of proposing anti-stress strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Dionne-Proulx, R Pépin. 1994. [Stress, seen from outside].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8076301/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effectiveness of academic admission interviews: an exploratory meta-analysis.

Admission to health-related professions is very competitive and selecting candidates with the best prospects for success is critical. A variety of measures are used to assess candidates to predict success. The purpose of this research was to assess the effectiveness of using selection interviews for admissions. Meta-analysis was applied to a sample of 20 studies examined in a comprehensive review article on the use of interviews in healthcare academic disciplines. Nineteen of these studies examined the relationship between performance in an interview situation and academic performance, while 10 examined the relationship between performance in an interview situation and clinical performance. A separate meta-analysis was conducted for each category of performance measure. The mean sample-size-effect size for studies examining the predictive power of interviews for academic success was 0.06 (95% confidence intervals 0.03-0.08), indicating a very small effect. The sample of studies was homogeneous using a fixed-effect model. The sample of studies for predicting clinical success had a mean effect size of 0.17 (95% confidence intervals 0.11-0.22), indicating modest positive predictive power. Using a random-effects model, this sample of studies was also homogeneous. Future research should investigate a larger sample of primary studies.

Health Occupations↗