PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8079229

[Empathy in theory and practice].

Abstract

Empathy is an important part of a doctor's repertoire in his or her professional work with patients. It is also an element of a person's ability to understand other persons. Empathic capacity is developed in early childhood, but is based on biological mechanisms. Emotions communicate important sides of people's psychological state. To understand emotional communication, the helper himself must have a certain degree of empathic capacity. Patients treated by empathic doctors are more satisfied with the treatment and are more likely to follow the doctor's advice than patients treated by less empathic doctors. Higher levels of empathic communication with patients can be learned through participating in specific educational programmes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Nerdrum. 1994-05-10. [Empathy in theory and practice].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8079229/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗