PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8090870

[Documentation with a digital image workstation].

Abstract

PAC systems are economically advantageous if the use of hardcopies for reporting, archiving and demonstrations is restricted. In place of a film a CRT display has to be used for visualisation. Problems in reporting regarding brightness, contrast, intensity and spatial resolution are described and compared to conventional X-ray films. Results from different studies using CRT displays for reporting are summarised and compared. Some of these studies show reduced diagnostic accuracy if a CRT display is used. This problem may be solved by further developments and by the implementation of software, e.g. computer-aided diagnosis. If the quality of reporting on a CRT display is increased and equivalent to the film, the introduction of a PACS will be qualitatively and economically acceptable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Fiebich, W Wiesmann, P E Peters. 1994. [Documentation with a digital image workstation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8090870/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scottish MDs benefit from database model developed in Saskatchewan.

A data-tracking system developed in Saskatchewan has helped health authorities in Scotland identify some deficiencies in the way certain drugs are prescribed and used. A researcher who published survey results in a local medical journal said the findings have helped doctors improve prescribing practices and identified a need to educate patients about the way antidepressant drugs work.

Computer Systems

Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare efficiency and outcome of a standard film-only system with those of a digital picture archiving and communication system (PACS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The film-only system, which used either analog film or computed radiography (CR) hard copy, was compared with a PACS, which used CR images displayed on a multiviewer in the radiology department and a workstation in the medical intensive care unit. A random sample of nonroutine, bedside chest radiographs was studied. RESULTS: Within 20 minutes of completion of radiography, 246 of 328 (75%) of the images were available at the workstations; it took 1.8 hours for 238 of 317 (75%) of the images to be displayed on the multiviewer. When the workstation was used, the staff did not access the image information earlier, but clinical actions were initiated more promptly in response to imaging findings. Consultation with radiologists decreased from 507 of 561 (90%) images with hard copies to 70 of 249 (28%) with the workstation. CONCLUSION: Use of a PACS improves the delivery of chest images, facilitates the initiation of clinical actions, and decreases input by radiologists.

Computer Systems