Cytology result entry without using the keyboard.

R D Aller; C DeWitt

PubMed · 8091908

Cytology result entry without using the keyboard.

Abstract

Many keystrokes are needed to enter routine gynecologic cytology results into many computer systems. Not only is this quite time consuming, but typing errors cannot be avoided and are not always detected before the report is sent to the clinician. Because of continuing shortages of staff time and the desire to avoid transcription errors, we began using $400 bar code wands to enter cytology results and billing information. No changes in our laboratory information system software or tables were necessary. Accession number labels are preprinted on a stand-alone printer. Bar code sheets, containing common keystroke sequences, are printed using a standard Macintosh computer and Laserwriter printer. Scanning the bar codes exactly emulates those keystrokes typed on the keyboard. We have entered the results of > 99% of our gynecologic cytology cases in the past two years without touching the keyboard.

Explore related subjects

Cytological Techniques Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted Electronic Data Processing Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Neoplasms, Female Humans Software Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R D Aller, C DeWitt. Cytology result entry without using the keyboard.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8091908/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1995

[The changed role of the pathologist in medical care. I. Increasingly more possibilities with increasingly less material].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cytological Techniques↗

PubMed1995

Sperm morphology: assessing the agreement between the manual method (strict criteria) and the sperm morphology analyzer IVOS.

OBJECTIVES: To correlate the percentage normal morphology reported by different observers and a computerized method (IVOS; Hamilton-Thorne Research, Beverly, MA) on a slide-by-slide basis using strict criteria: [1] Experienced observer (T.F.K.) versus experienced observer (R.M.), [2] experienced observer (T.F.K.) versus sperm morphology analyzer (IVOS), and [3] repeatability of normal and abnormal cells (IVOS). DESIGN SETTING, PATIENTS: Slides from 30 different patients from the Tygerberg IVF program were selected randomly. Microscopic fields and sperm cells were chosen randomly and percent normal morphology was recorded (objectives 1 and 2). The same slides were used and a cell-by-cell repeatability was done as outlined (objective 3). RESULTS: Experiment 1 (objective 1): there was no significant bias between T.F.K. and R.M. The limits of agreement were 8.6% and -7.3%. The SDs were not significantly different (P = 0.1283). The Spearman correlation coefficient between readers was 0.83. Experiment 2 (objective 2): the same findings were reported but the limits of agreement were 12.1% and -15.5%. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.85. The limits of agreement was tighter below 20% normal forms (+8.4 and -6.6). Experiment 3 (objective 3) (repeatability): 255 cells were analyzed three times in succession. Estimating pairwise agreement, the kappa statistic for the pairs are 0.85, 0.80, and 0.85, respectively, which compares favorably with the second canonical moment of 0.8329 (kappa = 0.83). DISCUSSION: The computer's ability to classify normal morphology per slide is promising. Below 20% normal forms, the limit of agreement is tight. Because of the 6% higher reading compared with the manual method, different thresholds possibly will be developed to identify subfertile from fertile patients. The computer gives excellent repeatability of normal and abnormal cells. Based on results obtained, this system can be of clinical value both in IVF units and andrology laboratories but more clinical data is required in this field.

Cytological Techniques↗

PubMed1995

Quality control of imprint and tissue section DNA ploidy analysis in image analysis systems utilizing cell culture-based control materials.

Currently, there are no standard controls available for quality control of DNA ploidy assays in image analysis systems. The authors have developed a system of controls based on cultured human cell lines that can mimic tissue sections and touch preparations. This allows for quality control for the entire process for DNA ploidy analysis from the initial cutting of the paraffin block or production of the touch preparation through fixation, staining, and interactive image analysis. The use of cell line controls rather than normal tissue is advantageous because of cell population homogeneity and the volume of uniform slides that are obtainable. This system, while providing an excellent means of controlling day-to-day performance of DNA ploidy analysis, may also be adapted for use as a means of multi-institutional proficiency testing.

Cytological Techniques↗