PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8092799

[Thyroid cytology: evaluation and perspectives].

Abstract

For the majority of centres worldwide that specialize in the treatment of thyroid diseases, cytology is now the first investigation carried out in patients with thyroid nodules. Procedures and expected results of this examination are described, together with the progress accomplished by immunocytochemical detection of malignancy markers such as thyroid peroxidase (TPO). Puncture biopsy is preferably by fine needle aspiration, the quality of the examination depending essentially on the quality of the specimen and the cytologist's experience. Results are recorded as benign (colloid nodules and thyroiditis), intermediate (microfollicular tumors, doubtful lesions) and malignant (follicular, papillary, anaplastic and medullary carcinomas). In experienced hands, the average sensitivity of the examination for cancer detection is 90 to 95% and its specificity 65 to 75%. These limits result from a non significant level of sampling of 10 to 20% and the persistence of 2 to 5% of false negatives, independent of the cytologist's expertise. Based on results of an ongoing cohort study comprising at present 300 histologically controlled cases, immunodetection of TPO in puncture biopsy specimens using MAb 47 antibodies could result in a sensitivity of about 100% for a specificity of more than 90%.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C de Micco. 1993. [Thyroid cytology: evaluation and perspectives].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8092799/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗