PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8099468

Bar-code technology applied to drug-use evaluation.

Abstract

Bar-code technology was used to determine: (1) patterns in histamine H2-receptor antagonist use and (2) the occurrence of adverse drug effects and drug interactions associated with the use of these agents in critically ill patients. Patients at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit) receiving histamine H2-receptor antagonists over a two-month period were evaluated. Clinical information was collected in the intensive care units by using a bar-code system. The data-capture menu was based on drug-use-evaluation criteria for H2-receptor antagonists. Data collected in the scanning wands were uploaded into a computer database and were analyzed at the end of the study. Data were collected for 207 patients. Cimetidine was the predominant H2-receptor antagonist used, and the predominant indication was stress-ulcer prophylaxis. Dosing trends followed accepted guidelines for cimetidine dosage adjustment in renal and hepatic failure. Two drug interactions and six adverse drug reactions occurred. Pharmacists made 92 recommendations to the medical staff regarding modification in therapy, involving 32% of the patients. Data collection required an average of 10 minutes per day each for three pharmacists. H2-receptor antagonist use patterns were evaluated in intensive care units through the application of bar-code technology. The speed and efficiency of this automated tool facilitated collection of a large amount of data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B J Zarowitz, A Petitta, M Mlynarek, M Touchette, M Peters, P Long, R Patel. 1993. Bar-code technology applied to drug-use evaluation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8099468/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of an automated, nursing unit-based drug-dispensing device on medication errors.

The effect of an automated drug-dispensing system on medication error rates was studied. Disguised observations were made on nursing units just before (phase 1) and two months after (phase 2) the implementation of Medstation Rx (Pyxis, San Diego, CA) at a 600-bed hospital. Information gathered included the time of drug administration, the time the medication as ordered to be given, a description of what happened during administration of the dose, and the type of medication error, if any. During phase 1 there were 873 observations and 148 medication errors, for an error rate of 16.9%. During phase 2 the error rate was 10.4% (97 errors in 929 observations). In both study phases, most of the errors were wrong-time errors. The mean +/- S.D. difference between actual and scheduled administration times was 34.5 +/- 48.9 minutes in phase 1 and 30.1 +/- 31.6 minutes in phase 2. Both the decrease in the error rate and the decrease in the departure from scheduled administration times were statistically significant. Medstation Rx was associated with a reduction in the rate of medication errors at a large hospital.

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems